2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58657-7_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Solving Bilevel D.C.-Convex Optimization Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it allows one to reformulate two-stage stochastic programming problems, whose second stage problem has DC (Difference-of-Convex) objective function and DC constraints, as equivalent unconstrained DC optimization problems and apply the well-developed apparatus of DC optimization to find their solutions (cf. analogous results for bilevel programming problems in [33,42]). Let us also note that exact penalty functions for singlestage stochastic programming were analysed in [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, it allows one to reformulate two-stage stochastic programming problems, whose second stage problem has DC (Difference-of-Convex) objective function and DC constraints, as equivalent unconstrained DC optimization problems and apply the well-developed apparatus of DC optimization to find their solutions (cf. analogous results for bilevel programming problems in [33,42]). Let us also note that exact penalty functions for singlestage stochastic programming were analysed in [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Thus, Theorem 3 opens a way for applications of DC programming algorithms to two-stage stochastic programming problems (cf. [33,42]).…”
Section: Exact Penalty Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two issues caused by the multipliers in the MPEC approach. Firstly, in theory, if the LL has more than one multiplier, the resulting MPEC is not equivalent to the original BLO if local optimality is considered [54]. Secondly, the introduced auxiliary multiplier variables limit the numerical efficiency in solving the BLO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%