2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On accommodating spatial interactions in a Generalized Heterogeneous Data Model (GHDM) of mixed types of dependent variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this analysis, it is assumed that the choices on mobility tools are made simul- 10 taneously. As such multiple choices may share common underlying unobserved factors and one outcome might be an endogenous factor in another outcome, jointly modeling multiple outcomes accounts for interdependencies and provides deeper insights into the decision making process [4,5,6,7]. 15 For a long time, (motor-)bikes, private vehicles and public transportation subscriptions were the only relevant mobility tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this analysis, it is assumed that the choices on mobility tools are made simul- 10 taneously. As such multiple choices may share common underlying unobserved factors and one outcome might be an endogenous factor in another outcome, jointly modeling multiple outcomes accounts for interdependencies and provides deeper insights into the decision making process [4,5,6,7]. 15 For a long time, (motor-)bikes, private vehicles and public transportation subscriptions were the only relevant mobility tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…multinomial or ordered outcomes, in which common unobserved factors and endogeneity might be present [6]. The multivariate Probit also allows to accommodate truncated samples [35,36] as well as spatial and social interaction [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can present a list of methodological and behavioral issues that must -in principle -be considered. For example, endogeneity of car ownership in car use (Bhat and Sen, 2006;Bhat et al, 2014), residential self-selection of households with a preference for cars into car friendly locations (Mokhtarian and Cao, 2008;Cao et al, 2009;Ewing and Cervero, 2010) or spatial autocorrelation of observations (Clark, 2007;Bhat et al, 2016), but given the scope of analysis, many of these issues have to be accepted. For example, Cervero and Kockelman (1997) noted that "the relationship between control variables like vehicle ownership and built environment could be endogenous, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint modeling of multiple related outcomes, e.g., car ownership and use, is motivated by potential common, underlying, unobserved factors in the decision-making process that simultaneously affect outcomes. Ignoring jointness in choices can lead to inefficient estimates of effects and inconsistent estimates of structural effects (Bhat et al 2016 Jointness can be established in several ways. First, multivariate probit-based models consider common underlying factors in multiple outcomes via error term correlation (e.g., Andrés and Gélvez 2014;Scott and Axhausen 2006;Yamamoto 2009).…”
Section: Modeling Travel Behavior -Mobility Tool Ownership and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the multivariate probit, Bhat and colleagues extended the multivariate probit to model mixed types of dependent variables, e.g., nominal, ordinal, count and continuous outcomes, e.g., location, car ownership, number of trips and trip distance (Bhat 2015;Bhat et al 2014). is modeling approach has also proved suitable for accommodating spatial or social interactions (Bhat et al 2016). Second, copula based models define linking functions between the error terms of outcomes other than the normal distribution, i.e., Gaussian copula (e.g., Spissu et al 2009).…”
Section: Modeling Travel Behavior -Mobility Tool Ownership and Usementioning
confidence: 99%