2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1748499518000076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On age difference in joint lifetime modelling with life insurance annuity applications

Abstract: Insurance and annuity products covering several lives require the modelling of the joint distribution of future lifetimes. In the interest of simplifying calculations, it is common in practice to assume that the future lifetimes among a group of people are independent. However, extensive research over the past decades suggests otherwise. In this paper, a copula approach is used to model the dependence between lifetimes within a married couple using data from a large Canadian insurance company. As a novelty, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional dependence between lifetimes further to the contagion effects resulting directly from the loss is therefore generated through implementation of their model. Although dependence due to unobserved risk factors is not considered by Dufresne et al (2018), incorporation of age difference and sex of the elder spouse in definition of the level of association between coupled lifetimes in a copula model, supports suggestion of asymmetric dependence. Jevtić and Hurd (2017) introduce an alternative to copula dependence in the credit risk environment through definition of a probabilistic mechanism describing the influence the primary death has on the bereaved spouse.…”
Section: Review Of Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional dependence between lifetimes further to the contagion effects resulting directly from the loss is therefore generated through implementation of their model. Although dependence due to unobserved risk factors is not considered by Dufresne et al (2018), incorporation of age difference and sex of the elder spouse in definition of the level of association between coupled lifetimes in a copula model, supports suggestion of asymmetric dependence. Jevtić and Hurd (2017) introduce an alternative to copula dependence in the credit risk environment through definition of a probabilistic mechanism describing the influence the primary death has on the bereaved spouse.…”
Section: Review Of Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the case of widowers, the pattern of changing mortality differs slightly from the general findings of the investigation, 13.7% of widowers at risk died within the first six months following the bereavement whilst just 5.9% died in the second, a difference in mortality found to be significant at the 1% level. Frees et al (1996), Carriere (2000), Youn and Shemyakin (1999), Shemyakin and Youn (2006), Spreeuw and Wang (2008), Luciano et al (2016) and Dufresne et al (2018) are amongst a number of studies making use of data from a large Canadian insurer. Observations include increased mortality for widows and widowers in comparison to non-widowed lives, maximum mortality rates among individuals having lost their partner less than one year ago and the implication of a greater influence of broken-heart syndrome on men rather than women.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As done in Dufresne et al (2018) for the same data set, we will apply the two-stage parametric method for censored data introduced in Shih and Louis (1995).…”
Section: Estimation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuarial literature many families of distributions have been proposed and studied to fit the distributional properties of residual lifetimes. Taking into account the data set on which we want to test the EMO model, we assume that marginal residual lifetimes follow a Gompertz law, taking into account the fact that in Frees et al (1996) and in Carriere (2000) it was proved that this distribution performed a very good fit in this data set (the same choice is done in Dufresne et al (2018), and in a generalized approach in Luciano et al (2008), Ji et al (2011) and Luciano et al (2016)). More precisely, we assume that residual lifetimes survival distributions from ages x m and x f are given bȳ…”
Section: The Joint Lifetimes Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation