1996
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3975(95)00060-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On an approximation measure founded on the links between optimization and polynomial approximation theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our branch-and-bound procedure is not destined to be embedimation ratio (recall that differential approximation is concerned with how far the value of a solution is from the worst possible value [11]) or as a conventional approximation ratio [12] for the maximization problem complementary to the PMP problem which asks to maximize the sum of the costs of the moves which are not interrupted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, our branch-and-bound procedure is not destined to be embedimation ratio (recall that differential approximation is concerned with how far the value of a solution is from the worst possible value [11]) or as a conventional approximation ratio [12] for the maximization problem complementary to the PMP problem which asks to maximize the sum of the costs of the moves which are not interrupted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, computationally cheaper, but weaker, lower bounds can be obtained from any upper bound for problem (11), the so-called Dantzig bound obtained by solving the linear relaxation of the knapsack problem would be an example.…”
Section: Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use (6), (7), and (8) to upper-bound the left side of inequality (9). We have By expressing inequalities (1)- (5) and (11) in standard form, we obtain our parameterized LP lemma.…”
Section: This Naturally Corresponds To a Star Set Cover O For (V S) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximation ratio of a solution for complementary set cover can be thought of as comparing the "distance" of a solution for set cover from the worst possible solution (i.e., the one that uses n sets to cover the elements) to the distance of the best solution of the worst possible one. This yields an alternative performance measure for the analysis of approximation algorithms; such measures have been considered for many combinatorial optimization problems in the context of differential approximation algorithms [10,9] or z-approximations [16] (see also [3,4]). Duh and Fürer [11] also consider the application of their algorithm on instances of complementary set cover in which the collection of sets is not given explicitly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of A is expressed by the means of approximation ra-tios that somehow compare the approximate value to the optimum one. So far, two measures stand out from the literature: the standard ratio [2] (the most widely used) and the differential ratio [3,4,7,10]. The standard ratio is defined by ρ Π (I, A) = apx Π (I)/opt Π (I) if Π is a maximization problem, by ρ Π (I, A) = opt Π (I)/apx Π (I) otherwise, whereas the differential ratio is defined by δ Π (I, A)(wor Π (I) − apx Π (I))/(wor Π (I) − opt Π (I)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%