1979
DOI: 10.1002/zamm.19790591106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On an Improper Modification of a Variational Principle for Finite Element Plate Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar procedure of enforcing boundary conditions by Lagrange multipliers which are subsequently removed was described in the context of elasticity problems by Key. 22 Key's formulation, sometimes referred to as a "Simpliÿed Variational Principle", was explored by Haugeneder et al [23][24][25][26] in various studies. A criticism based on analysis of single line elements indicates that this approach may reduce accuracy on the boundary.…”
Section: Variational Statement With Weak Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar procedure of enforcing boundary conditions by Lagrange multipliers which are subsequently removed was described in the context of elasticity problems by Key. 22 Key's formulation, sometimes referred to as a "Simpliÿed Variational Principle", was explored by Haugeneder et al [23][24][25][26] in various studies. A criticism based on analysis of single line elements indicates that this approach may reduce accuracy on the boundary.…”
Section: Variational Statement With Weak Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A piecewise linear ÿnite element solution u h that is based on Galerkin approximation of this formulation is nodally exact since the corresponding Green's function is piecewise linear (see, e.g., Reference 44, pp. [24][25][26][27]. Thus, for a mesh of n+1 nodes such that x 1 = 0, x A ¡x A+1 ; A = 1; : : : ; n, and x n+1 = 1 u h (x A ) = u(x A ); A= 1; : : : ; n (96) and u h (1) = g is an admissibility requirement of the approximate trial solution.…”
Section: I1 E Ect Of Eliminating Lagrange Multipliers That Enforce mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 Key's formulation, sometimes referred to as a 'Simpliÿed Variational Principle,' was explored with mixed results by Mang, Gallagher and Haugeneder in various studies. [20][21][22][23] Our formulation di ers signiÿcantly from Key's, however, in at least two respects. First, we integrate by parts in the unbounded domain and therefore require our basis functions there to exactly satisfy the di erential equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This formulation is exact and free of constraint degrees of freedom, and can be used to recover many well-known formulations developed previously [11; 16], including the DtN boundary conditions. Criticism [23][24][25][26][27][28] of a similar approach [29] (also related to Reference 30) is examined in Reference 10, leading to the conclusion that for our purposes (namely, enforcing ux continuity across the boundary) this procedure can lead to an e ective and accurate numerical method. Conservation properties and the well-posedness of the formulation in terms of uniqueness of its solutions are established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%