2020
DOI: 10.1002/nla.2282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On approximating the nearest Ω‐stable matrix

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of approximating a given matrix with a matrix whose eigenvalues lie in some specific region Ω of the complex plane. More precisely, we consider three types of regions and their intersections: conic sectors, vertical strips, and disks. We refer to this problem as the nearest Ω-stable matrix problem. This includes as special cases the stable matrices for continuous and discrete time linear time-invariant systems. In order to achieve this goal, we parameterize this problem u… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach to tackle the SOF and SSF problems can be extended to find feedbacks that make the system Ω-stable. A matrix is said to be Ω-stable if its eigenvalues belong to the set Ω ⊂ C. In [7], a parametrization of Ω-stable matrices was obtained in terms of DH matrices that satisfy additional LMI constraints, where Ω is the intersection of specific regions in the complex plane; namely conic sectors, vertical strips, and disks. For example, one may want the real parts of the eigenvalues of A − BKC to be strictly smaller than some given negative value so that A − BK is robustly stable (see also Remark 3 below).…”
Section: Extension To ω-Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach to tackle the SOF and SSF problems can be extended to find feedbacks that make the system Ω-stable. A matrix is said to be Ω-stable if its eigenvalues belong to the set Ω ⊂ C. In [7], a parametrization of Ω-stable matrices was obtained in terms of DH matrices that satisfy additional LMI constraints, where Ω is the intersection of specific regions in the complex plane; namely conic sectors, vertical strips, and disks. For example, one may want the real parts of the eigenvalues of A − BKC to be strictly smaller than some given negative value so that A − BK is robustly stable (see also Remark 3 below).…”
Section: Extension To ω-Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these parametrizations, the results obtained in Sections 3 and 4 can be directly extended to obtain a characterization of static stabilizing feedbacks that guarantee Ω-stability in terms of DH matrices. The corresponding optimization problems (5.7) and (5.9) would be subject to additional LMIs on the variables J, R and Q depending on the Ω region; see [7,.…”
Section: Extension To ω-Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the literature interest has been given also to more exotic choices. For instance, in [9] this problem is considered for the case where Ω is a region generated by the intersection of lines and circles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Curtis, Mitchell and Overton [10], improving on a previous method by Lewis and Overton [33], use a BFGS method for non-smooth problems, applying it directly to the largest real part among all eigenvalues. -Choudhary, Gillis and Sharma [9,16] use a reformulation using dissipative Hamiltonian systems, paired with various optimization methods, including semidefinite programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [4] use the projected gradient descent method to solve such a problem. In paper [1], a block coordinate descent method for this optimization problem (1.1) is proposed. The nearest stable matrix pair problems have been considered in [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%