2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10502-012-9197-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On archival pluralism: what religious pluralism (and its critics) can teach us about archives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this instance, the group's identity is formulated and regulated by an outside body, the Archive, with no writing or scholarship as of the writing of this paper about the potential to include community members in this designation process. This paper situates a collective process of negotiating a Designated Community between an archive and its consumers within progressive work in archive, library, and museum practices (Boast, ; PACG ; Caswell, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this instance, the group's identity is formulated and regulated by an outside body, the Archive, with no writing or scholarship as of the writing of this paper about the potential to include community members in this designation process. This paper situates a collective process of negotiating a Designated Community between an archive and its consumers within progressive work in archive, library, and museum practices (Boast, ; PACG ; Caswell, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions problematizing the definition and description of records (Conway, forthcoming;Duff & Harris, 2002;MacNeil, 2005;Millar, 2002;Yakel, 2003), the construction of their identity (Rowat, 1993;Trace, 2002;Yeo, 2010), their contextual aspects (McKemmish & Piggott, 2013;Nesmith, 2006), their temporal aspects (K. Brothman, 2006;Cumming, 2010;Meehan, 2006Meehan, , 2009Upward, 1996Upward, , 2009, and their custodial communities (Bastian, 2002;Caswell, 2013;Christen, 2012;Huvila, 2008) have become endemic within the archival field, leading Upward and colleagues (2013) to lament that "we cannot reliably say what a record as a thing is as our conceptual understanding of it blurs into data, documents, information, the archive, and the plurality of archives. .…”
Section: The Ontology Of Lis Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….power is always central." 36 In fact libraries and archives continue to struggle with the inclusion of a variety of voices. A recent study from the Pluralizing the Archival Curriculum Group of The Archival Education and Research Institute states that, "While one can identify various excellent organizationally sponsored initiatives, there is no evidence that the archival field as a whole has contemplated the implications of working in such partnerships with communities."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%