2018
DOI: 10.1017/fms.2018.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Binary Correlations of Multiplicative Functions

Abstract: We study logarithmically averaged binary correlations of bounded multiplicative functions g1 and g2. A breakthrough on these correlations was made by Tao, who showed that the correlation average is negligibly small whenever g1 or g2 does not pretend to be any twisted Dirichlet character, in the sense of the pretentious distance for multiplicative functions. We consider a wider class of real-valued multiplicative functions gj, namely those that are uniformly distributed in arithmetic progressions to fixed modul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was conjectured in the correspondence of Erdős and Turán [35] (and repeated by Erdős in [10]) that the set of n with P + (n) < P + (n + 1) has asymptotic density equal to 1/2, as one would naturally expect. In [43], it was shown that the logarithmic density of this set indeed equals 1/2. For orderings of longer strings of consecutive values of P + (n), little is known, but Wang [44] showed that either of P + (n + i) < min j≤J j =i P + (n + j) and P + (n + i) > max j≤J j =i P + (n + j) happens with positive lower density for any J ≥ 3.…”
Section: Comparison Of Largest Prime Factors Of Consecutive Integersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was conjectured in the correspondence of Erdős and Turán [35] (and repeated by Erdős in [10]) that the set of n with P + (n) < P + (n + 1) has asymptotic density equal to 1/2, as one would naturally expect. In [43], it was shown that the logarithmic density of this set indeed equals 1/2. For orderings of longer strings of consecutive values of P + (n), little is known, but Wang [44] showed that either of P + (n + i) < min j≤J j =i P + (n + j) and P + (n + i) > max j≤J j =i P + (n + j) happens with positive lower density for any J ≥ 3.…”
Section: Comparison Of Largest Prime Factors Of Consecutive Integersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We introduce the cocycle ρ : (0, +∞) × (0, +∞) → C by defining ρ(x 1 , x 2 ) for x 1 , x 2 > 0 to be the unique complex number of size O(ε) such that α(x 1 x 2 ) = α(x 1 )α(x 2 ) exp(ρ(x 1 , x 2 )); (34) this is well-defined and measurable for ε small enough. Arguing exactly as in the proof of Lemma 2.8, we obtain the cocycle equation…”
Section: Proof Of Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [20], [22,Theorem A.1], [21] for some papers dealing with (1) and [22], [27], [16], [29] for some papers dealing with the latter problem. These results have also led to a number of applications, including a solution by Tao [26] to the famous Erdős discrepancy problem.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%