2002
DOI: 10.1021/pr0100117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Characterization of Dose Variations of 2-D Proteomics Maps by Matrix Invariants

Abstract: We explore the characterization of 2-D electrophoresis proteomics maps by certain structural invariants derived from matrixes constructed by considering for all pairs of spots in a proteomics maps the shortest (Euclidean) distances and distances measured along zigzag lines connecting protein spots of the neighboring abundance. This paper is a sequel to previous papers in which we outlined the idea of characterizing 2-D proteomics maps by graph-theoretical descriptors. To illustrate the approach, we selected da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…recognized different behavior of the response curve for small concentrations and large concentrations and concluded that the low-dose and high-dose effects of peroxisome proliferates could be qualitatively different. Similarly in a subsequent analysis of the same data, the work of Randić et al, one can notice a larger scatter of points in the dose−response curve for small concentrations of LY171883. Now it is clear that at least in the case of the later study, the information on proteome was obscured to some degree by including data on proteomics maps, that is, data on the proteins mass and the relative charge, which was incorporated in multivariate statistical analysis, including use of principal component analysis (PCA) but which is not essential for evaluation of proteome as such.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…recognized different behavior of the response curve for small concentrations and large concentrations and concluded that the low-dose and high-dose effects of peroxisome proliferates could be qualitatively different. Similarly in a subsequent analysis of the same data, the work of Randić et al, one can notice a larger scatter of points in the dose−response curve for small concentrations of LY171883. Now it is clear that at least in the case of the later study, the information on proteome was obscured to some degree by including data on proteomics maps, that is, data on the proteins mass and the relative charge, which was incorporated in multivariate statistical analysis, including use of principal component analysis (PCA) but which is not essential for evaluation of proteome as such.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Observe that in this analysis we have focused on cell proteome by simply considering only the information on the variation in the abundance of protein spots of the proteomics maps, and hence we are not trying to characterize the changes in the proteome maps, which would include information on the x and y coordinate of proteins spots. This appears to have been the objective of Anderson et al as well as of more recent analysis of the same data based on the construction of special distance matrix for a set of most intensive protein spots …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been shown that rats exposed to small doses of irradiation have better survival rate than the control group, which was not exposed to such radiation, when both are subject to large doses of irradiation , none of which revealed the presence of hormesis at the proteome level. The discovery of hormesis awaited development of an alternative approach to characterization of proteomics maps, which was focused on proteome (abundance of proteins spots in a 2-D gel) rather then on proteomics maps (which includes information on mass and the charge of proteins).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first experiment (Experiment 1), we show the use in an experimental example to use 2D-Lattice electrostatic parameters to numerically characterize protein sequences and seek a model to predict RNase III function without relying on alignment. Different classes of 2D graphs representations of DNA, RNA, protein sequence, or proteomic maps have been used by other researchers [87,91,92,[154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164]. We subsequently developed three different classifiers (one for each type of TIs) to connect protein sequence information (represented by TIs values) with the classification of sequences as RNase III or not.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%