2020
DOI: 10.1364/oe.382055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-chip fluorescence microscopy with a random microlens diffuser

Abstract: We present an on-chip, widefield fluorescence microscope, which consists of a diffuser placed a few millimeters away from a traditional image sensor. The diffuser replaces the optics of a microscope, resulting in a compact and easy-to-assemble system with a practical working distance of over 1.5 mm. Furthermore, the diffuser encodes volumetric information, enabling refocusability in post-processing and three-dimensional (3D) imaging of sparse samples from a single acquisition. Reconstruction of images from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike scanning approaches, single-shot methods [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] offer faster capture speeds, with a temporal resolution limited only by the camera frame rate. These methods encode information from the entire volume into a 2D measurement and then computationally reconstruct the 3D information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike scanning approaches, single-shot methods [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] offer faster capture speeds, with a temporal resolution limited only by the camera frame rate. These methods encode information from the entire volume into a 2D measurement and then computationally reconstruct the 3D information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further compare the 3 × 3 array PSF with other configurations, including a single focus, a 2 × 3 array, and a 2 × 2 array, and show that the decorrelation generally improves with the number of foci. To further quantitatively compare the axial resolving powers of different configurations, we adopt the full width at PCC = 0.8 proposed in ( 26 ) as a heuristic estimate of the axial resolution, which gives 155 μm for the 3 × 3 array, 179 μm for the 2 × 3 array, and 206 μm for the 2 × 2 array. In the next section, we show that these PCC-based axial resolution predictions agree well with our experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the lateral resolution is fundamentally limited by the NA of a single microlens. Customized aperiodic MLAs ( 19 , 26 ) having nonidentical NAs can open up a broader design space for improving the lateral resolution without compromising other imaging attributes. The axial resolution is physically limited by the total angular extent of the MLA, which can be moderately increased given the size constraint for the wearable application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This breaks the need to trade-off spatial and angular resolution, giving the best of both worlds if the sample is sufficiently sparse. Since we no longer need limiting apertures, we can even remove the objective lens, creating a lensless 3D imager that is just a sensor and a diffuser [59,[67][68][69] (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Diffusercam: a New Methods For Single-shot 3d Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%