2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On cohesive element parameters and delamination modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total 395,032 full integrated Lagrangian solid elements discretized the GLARE laminate. Keeping the interfacial strength, the finer CZEs fail faster [45]. The tendency is opposite when the CZEs are coarser [45].…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Total 395,032 full integrated Lagrangian solid elements discretized the GLARE laminate. Keeping the interfacial strength, the finer CZEs fail faster [45]. The tendency is opposite when the CZEs are coarser [45].…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Though, cross-ply GF/EP laminates were incorporated in the stacking sequence, the insertion of isotropic Al-layers resulted in a quasi-isotropic behavior of the GLARE laminate. The delamination shape of each inter-ply interface, therefore, was not necessarily oriented in the fiber direction of the lower ply, which is frequently seen in monolithic composite laminates [45].…”
Section: • C (G C80 = G C0 + (45%*g C0 ))mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where E is the Young's modulus of the material along the laminate thickness direction, t is the sub-laminate thickness , and M is a non-dimensional number that is to be chosen much larger than one. For cohesive interfaces in non-laminates t is not defined, so in (25) it can be replaced by a certain length measure h of the bulk material [78] or the finite element mesh size. Taking M = 100, E = E 22 = 1.05 × 10 4 N/mm 2 and t = 1.55 mm for the delamination tests (see Section 4), we estimate α 0 ≈ 10 6 N/mm 3 .…”
Section: Cohesive Zone Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this modified formulation of the cohesive constitutive law, the dependence of the macro-scale response on the inter-laminar strength can be eliminated but only during the delamination propagation after the peak load. The peak load is still affected by the inter-laminar strength, which is against the conclusion of the study of Lu et al (2019). Lu et al systematically analyzed the effect of inter-laminar strength on the delamination behavior, and it was found that in the presence of a stress concentration, such as a predelamination, the structural response is strength independent including both peak load and the response in the propagation part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%