2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-column liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with base stacking as a dual preconcentration method for capillary zone electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, traditional sample extraction procedures, based on conventional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) are often considered to be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and environmentally unfriendly due to usage of significant amount of potentially toxic organic solvents. In the past few years, many research efforts have been oriented towards the development of efficient, miniaturized and environmentally benign sample extraction methods, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [1][2][3][4][5][6] and liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [7][8][9][10][11]. SPME, which combines extraction and pre-concentration in a single step, is an efficient and solvent-free technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traditional sample extraction procedures, based on conventional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) are often considered to be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and environmentally unfriendly due to usage of significant amount of potentially toxic organic solvents. In the past few years, many research efforts have been oriented towards the development of efficient, miniaturized and environmentally benign sample extraction methods, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [1][2][3][4][5][6] and liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) [7][8][9][10][11]. SPME, which combines extraction and pre-concentration in a single step, is an efficient and solvent-free technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-column sample preconcentration methods were performed by changing the physico-chemical property of the sample solution relative to the background electrolyte (BGE) in order to preconcentrate the analytes, such as field amplification of enhancement (field-amplified sample stacking (FASS) [10,11] and large-volume sample stacking (LVSS) [12,13]), transient isotachophoresis (t-ITP) [14][15][16], dynamic pH junction [17,18], transient moving reaction boundary (tMCRBM) [19], micelle to solvent stacking (MSS) [20,21], pH mediated stacking [22,23], acetonitrile stacking [24], analyte focusing by micelle collapse (AFMC) [25] and sweeping [26][27][28][29][30][31], etc. Since being introduced in 1998 [27], sweeping MEKC has been accepted as an attractive and powerful on-column preconcentration method because of greatly improved concentration sensitivity both for neutral and charged molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enrichment factors of 3 orders of increase were obtained within 30 min. In addition, dual sample preconcentration methods of on-line three-phase SDME coupled with stacking technique were also developed [23,41]. The combinations can not only handle complex matrices directly but also further increase the sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CE has advantages of simplicity, high separation efficiency, short analysis time, and low consumption of samples and reagents. Both capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) are widely used as the separation modes for the simultaneous determination of pesticides (Xie et al 2009;Rodríguez-Gonzalo et al 2008;Ravelo-Pérez et al 2007a, b, c, 2008aMolina-Mayo et al 2007;Turiel et al 2000). However, CE has a drawback of low sensitivity when compared to HPLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%