1998
DOI: 10.1118/1.598250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On compensator design for photon beam intensity-modulated conformal therapy

Abstract: Recently the compensator has been shown to be an in expensive and reliable dose delivery device for photon beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The goal of IMRT compensator design is to produce an optimized primary fluence profile at the patient's surface obtained from the optimization procedure. In this paper some of the problems associated with IMRT compensator design, specifically the beam perturbations caused by the compensator, are discussed. A simple formula is derived to calculate the opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade compensator techniques have been used for delivering IMRT treatments designed by dose optimization algorithms. (2,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) Customized compensators are shaped to attenuate the open-field photon fluence such that the transmitted fluence map is as designed by the dose optimization algorithm. The obvious advantage of this IMRT delivery method is simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade compensator techniques have been used for delivering IMRT treatments designed by dose optimization algorithms. (2,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) Customized compensators are shaped to attenuate the open-field photon fluence such that the transmitted fluence map is as designed by the dose optimization algorithm. The obvious advantage of this IMRT delivery method is simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean energy of the beam increases after the beam passes through the modulator. Jiang and Ayyangar (20) showed that beam hardening resulted in greater change (sparing) in surface dose than in dose at depth with respect to maximum dose. Authors showed that for a 6‐MV 10×10 beam, a 10% maximum dose reduction occurred in surface dose and a 3% dose increase occurred in percent depth dose at 10 cm depth for Cerrobend slab 5 cm thick (p=9.76g/cm3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The μ eff depends on the cause of these parameters and is discussed in several articles. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] In this study, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS) are investigated to predict the thickness of the compensator filter in IMRT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%