1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60036-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Conflicts and Bargaining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Game theory suggests that cooperative solutions may be more likely where there is greater goal congruence (Apfelbaum, 1974), a more even balance of power (Pruitt and Kimmel, 1977), and more communication between the vendors and purchasers (Lindskold et al, 1986). Low levels of non-family management shareholdings may be associated with goal diversity, imbalance of power and weak communication (Schulze et al, 2002(Schulze et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Company Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Game theory suggests that cooperative solutions may be more likely where there is greater goal congruence (Apfelbaum, 1974), a more even balance of power (Pruitt and Kimmel, 1977), and more communication between the vendors and purchasers (Lindskold et al, 1986). Low levels of non-family management shareholdings may be associated with goal diversity, imbalance of power and weak communication (Schulze et al, 2002(Schulze et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Company Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MBO/I negotiations may be cooperative if founders are committed to the long-term future of the firm, and they have good relationships with (non-family) management. Greater sharing of information is expected if owners/managers are seeking some long-term involvement in the firm after the MBO/I, implying greater goal congruence with management (Apfelbaum, 1974). Founders may be more likely to seek this involvement because they may be reluctant to fully let go of the firms they have created and nurtured.…”
Section: Company Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relative power is defined as the capabilities to influence the other party's decision variables (Lin and Germain, 1998). The importance of power balance to collaboration has been recognized (Apfelbaum, 1974;Gray, 1989). When the power between collaborating parties is not balanced, they tend to struggle over power, leading to thwarting, interference and conflict (Wilmot and Hocker, 2001).…”
Section: The Relative Power Of Suppliermentioning
confidence: 99%