1997
DOI: 10.1080/00393279708588204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On contraction in modern English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Kjellmer's (1998) study of a British written corpus showed that Aux-contraction was high for will, but in this United States corpus and in Gasparrini's analysis of BNC urban leisure data, Aux-contracted tokens such as the one in (5) were too rare to permit analysis. Aux-contracted have not, as in (6), is more common in our database than in the English corpora discussed in the literature.…”
Section: Analysis Of Aux-contracted Vs Not-contracted Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Kjellmer's (1998) study of a British written corpus showed that Aux-contraction was high for will, but in this United States corpus and in Gasparrini's analysis of BNC urban leisure data, Aux-contracted tokens such as the one in (5) were too rare to permit analysis. Aux-contracted have not, as in (6), is more common in our database than in the English corpora discussed in the literature.…”
Section: Analysis Of Aux-contracted Vs Not-contracted Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older texts use full forms more than recent texts in the same genre or register (Biber, 1988). Written registers use full forms more consistently than spoken registers (Kjellmer, 1998, and Tottie, 1991, for British English; Yaeger-Dror, 1997, for American English). Bell (1984) showed that, in declarative sentences in news reporting, contracted forms are more common in the United States than in the British Commonwealth, and it is commonly believed that the full form is more common in British than in American conversational declaratives as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations