2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On crack band model in finite element analysis of concrete fracture in engineering practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular method of reducing mesh sensitivity based on the crack band theory proposed by Bazant and Oh [ 71 ] (mesh-adjusted softening modulus) for bigger element sizes results in a very steep descending branch (or even snap-back behaviour) [ 22 ], which is close to fully brittle behaviour. Conversely, in the case of very fine meshes, models based on these assumptions become unrealistically ductile [ 49 ]. Another moot point is the experimental testing of post-cracking behaviour, since it is often difficult to distinguish whether we are measuring material response or the interaction of a sample with test equipment (due to unintended friction) [ 11 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most popular method of reducing mesh sensitivity based on the crack band theory proposed by Bazant and Oh [ 71 ] (mesh-adjusted softening modulus) for bigger element sizes results in a very steep descending branch (or even snap-back behaviour) [ 22 ], which is close to fully brittle behaviour. Conversely, in the case of very fine meshes, models based on these assumptions become unrealistically ductile [ 49 ]. Another moot point is the experimental testing of post-cracking behaviour, since it is often difficult to distinguish whether we are measuring material response or the interaction of a sample with test equipment (due to unintended friction) [ 11 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitutive matrix is modified in the following manner: where: —parameter that controls softening rate. This parameter can be related to the fracture energy in compression: where: ; —characteristic element length (the lower bound was introduced, since models consisting of small elements predict very ductile behaviour of structures [ 49 ]), —fracture energy for compression, b —parameter, which allows for the increased ductility of a reinforced compressive zone to be taken into account ( for an unreinforced compressive zone and for a reinforced compressive zone), and —initial Young modulus. Fracture energy in compression can be calculated according to ( substituted in MPa) [ 50 ]: …”
Section: Proposed Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be mentioned that, for this model, mesh sensitive results can occur. Therefore, if the CSC model is applied in the computations of concrete structures, then the crack band theory [30] should be employed to set a proper size of the finite element corresponding to the expected cracking zone, see also [31,32]. Wide discussion concerning smeared cracking models can be found e.g., in [27,29].…”
Section: Concrete Smeared Cracking (Csc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steel-reinforced and fiber-reinforced materials have a large share in today’s engineering structures. In numerical modeling of fracture issues, it is then necessary to use a 3D computational model in conjunction with a material model of fracture-plastic (the fracture-plastic material model) [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The strength parameters of these materials relevant to numerical modeling include the compressive strength of concrete cubes, the tensile strength of three-point bending test, and the tensile strength of splitting perpendicular and parallel to the direction of fill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%