2020
DOI: 10.1142/s1793830920500901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On domination number of Latin square graphs of finite cyclic groups

Abstract: This paper aims to find certain bounds for the domination number of Latin square graphs, i.e., a simple graph assigned to a Latin square. In fact, we show that if [Formula: see text] is a Latin square of order [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is the associated Latin square graph of [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text]. We will investigate in which case the equalities hold. Finally, we study the domination number of Latin square graph associated to groups. In particular, we show that if [For… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2021 [11] Liu, Chanjuan discussed about the upper and lower bounds of domination number for n maximal outer planar graph. [5] Bermudo and others proposed some lower bounds on the domination number of a catacondensed hexagonal system using the number of hexagons and the number of branching hexagons [13]. Sarah et al found certain bounds for the domination number of Latin square graphs.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021 [11] Liu, Chanjuan discussed about the upper and lower bounds of domination number for n maximal outer planar graph. [5] Bermudo and others proposed some lower bounds on the domination number of a catacondensed hexagonal system using the number of hexagons and the number of branching hexagons [13]. Sarah et al found certain bounds for the domination number of Latin square graphs.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than trivial results such as for paths or cycles, perhaps the most famous result is the sprawling effort over a 27 year period [2,8,14,16,20,36] to provide a complete characterisation of domination numbers for grid graphs G(n, m) of all possible sizes, consisting of 23 special cases before settling into a standard formula for n, m ≥ 16. Other results for domination include generalized Petersen graphs [13,24,41], Cartesian products involving cycles [1,9,28], King graphs [40], Latin square graphs [29], hypercubes [3], Sierpiński graphs [34], Knödel graphs [12], and various graphs from chemistry [26,32], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than trivial results such as for paths or cycles, perhaps the most famous result is the sprawling effort over a 27 year period [18,14,8,34,2,12] to provide a complete characterisation of domination numbers for grid graphs G(n, m) of all possible sizes, consisting of 23 special cases before settling into a standard formula for n, m ≥ 16. Other results for domination include generalized Petersen graphs [41,23,39], Cartesian products involving cycles [26,9,1], King graphs [40], Latin square graphs [27], hypercubes [3], Sierpiński graphs [32], Knödel graphs [38], and various graphs from chemistry [25,30], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%