On Emerging Technology: What to Know When Your Patient Has a Microchip in His Hand

Fram, Brianna; Rivlin, Michael; Beredjiklian, Pedro K.

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.01.008

Cited by 37 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The perception of MIs as secure technology differs according to the country of residence and generational factors (Perakslis & Michael, 2012). Although there are plenty of perceived reasons to reject MIs for employee identification (Michael, Aloudat, Michael, & Perakslis, 2017), MIs have been adopted by healthy people for various non-therapeutic purposes (Fram, Rivlin, & Beredjiklian, 2020).…”

Section: Conception (Overall)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The user experience of personalized content

Mejtoft¹,

Lindmark²,

Söderström³

et al. 2020

33rd Bled eConference – Enabling Technology for a Sustainable Society: June 28 – 29, 2020, Online Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Content in digital services is often filtered for users based on individual preferences with the possible consequence of creating a state referred to as a “filter bubble”. The objective of this paper is to examine which of a user’s inherent needs that are important to satisfy when a user is consuming personalized content in a digital service. The paper uses a survey to measure the need for autonomy, competence and relatedness of the SelfDetermination Theory when users are consuming filtered content in digital services. The results show that the investigated services fail to satisfy all needs. A satisfactory user experience should include the opportunity for the user to satisfy the need for autonomy, competence and relatedness. For autonomy, transparency of filtering and choice about filtering should be offered. For competence, it is essential to offer content that the user can learn from, and also provide the right amount of choice throughout the service. The danger of filter bubbles is not personalization, but to remove choice about personalization.

show abstract

Section: Conception (Overall)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The user experience of personalized content

Mejtoft¹,

Lindmark²,

Söderström³

et al. 2020

33rd Bled eConference – Enabling Technology for a Sustainable Society: June 28 – 29, 2020, Online Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The use of MI in animals and humans has been medically criticized several times (Albrecht, 2010), but recent research shows that they cannot migrate in the body (Graveling et al., 2018), are safe when performing body scans (Fram et al., 2020), and can even be used to treat cancer (Lai et al., 2016). MIs have also been criticized for security reasons, particularly their long read range and the associated possibility of theft.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The small transponders encapsulated in glass, first injected under the skin of cows to control the amount of hormones and medications, are still used as MIs to identify pets or stray animals in cities (Kumar et al., 2013). Chips have also been implanted in humans for over two decades (Fram et al., 2020). The further development and practical use of MI led to a variety of applications in healthcare for drug delivery (Farra et al., 2012), dentures (Venkat et al., 2019), or patient care (Bauer, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Migration of MI within the body was initially noted, but measures have been taken to prevent such migration (Graveling et al., 2018). Despite concerns about the scanning of patients with MI when performing MRI or CT scans, research indicates that the procedures are likely safe in awake cooperative patients (Fram et al., 2020). Security issues : In the early stages of development, the risk of theft of MI data by various RFID readers was discussed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The profile of future consumer with microchip implant: Habits and characteristics

Žnidaršič

Баггиа

Werber

2022

Int J Consumer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Passive radio frequency identification microchip implants (MIs) have been the subject of public debate for nearly two decades, due to differing views on issues of privacy and impact on the human body, as well as actual successful applications in healthcare. Nonetheless, advances in technology imply that consumers may use MIs for identification, shopping, and other activities in the future. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics and habits of individuals who are more likely to use a MI in the near future. A cross‐sectional study was conducted in five countries: Poland, Croatia, Slovenia, Ukraine, and the Russian Federation. Convenience sampling and an online questionnaire were used to collect data from 2037 respondents. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the research questions, and the results showed the predictors of willingness to use MIs. The potential MI user is male, has multiple social media profiles, and has a history of losing keys, wallets, or ID cards. He tends to use credit cards, contactless payments, and payment services when shopping. His willingness to use a MI decreases with age. Based on these findings, retailers and other service providers can adapt their processes to successfully support the future consumer with MI.

show abstract

“…From tags used for tracking in industry to microchips in glass tubes used to identify pets and stray animals (Landaluce et al, 2020). Since the first attempt to implant a microchip in 1998, microchips implants (MI) have occasionally been used in humans (Fram et al, 2020), mainly for healthcare applications (Bauer, 2007;Farra et al, 2012;Venkat et al, 2019). To date, MIs have been used by individuals (Ip et al, 2008), for entertainment (Michael & Michael, 2010), or in organizations (Rodriguez, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

41 st International Conference on Organizational Science Development

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Povzetek Trajnostni razvoj je eden izmed ključnih dejavnikov razvoja v zadnjih tridesetih letih na gospodarskem, družbenem in okoljskem področju. V tej raziskavi smo se osredotočili na družbeni vidik trajnostnega razvoja, ki ga obravnava tudi četrti cilj: kakovostno izobraževanje v okviru Združenih narodov. Rezultati ankete pri 203 dijakih so pokazali, da imajo dijaki občutek nizkega znanja o trajnostnem razvoju, saj so se samoocenili s povprečno oceno 2,36 (od maks. 5) in s standardnim odklonom 0,72. Pri pomembnosti trajnostnega razvoja v družbi so dijaki ocenjevali boljše, povprečna ocena je bila 3,78, standardni odklon pa 0,80. Korelacijska analiza kaže na srednjo šibko povezanost med spremenljivkama ocene lastnega znanja in pomembnostjo trajnostnega razvoja. Definicija trajnostnega razvoja ni popolnoma razumljiva pri 48 % dijakov, saj na vprašanje niso odgovorili ali pa so odgovorili napačno. Četrtina (25 %) anketiranih dijakov razume trajnostni razvoj z vidika varovanja okolja, družbeni vidik so prepoznali v 7 %, ekonomski pa le v 2 %. Pri pridobivanju znanja na tem področju so v ospredju mediji in socialna omrežja.

show abstract

On Emerging Technology: What to Know When Your Patient Has a Microchip in His Hand

Cited by 37 publications

References 18 publications

The user experience of personalized content

The user experience of personalized content

The profile of future consumer with microchip implant: Habits and characteristics

41 st International Conference on Organizational Science Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About