2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-8693(03)00336-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On equations defining Coincident Root loci

Abstract: We revisit an old problem in classical invariant theory, viz. that of giving algebraic conditions for a binary form to have linear factors with assigned multiplicities. We construct a complex of SL 2 -representations such that the desired algebraic conditions are expressible as a specific cohomology group of this complex.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with [1, Theorem 1.4], this completely proves the following result which was first conjectured in [7]. Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Binary Formssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Together with [1, Theorem 1.4], this completely proves the following result which was first conjectured in [7]. Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Binary Formssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…well-known book by Gelfand et al [7]) but an alternative term ''generalised coincident root loci'' looks too long and not much better. We would like to mention that the problem of finding the algebraic equations defining the strata in the discriminants is nontrivial and goes back to Arthur Cayley [2] (see [4,9,27] for the recent results in this direction).…”
Section: Generalised Discriminants and Deformed Cms Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, (and what is more to the point) I believe that the construction used here is of interest not confined to this example. In [4], it was used on varieties defined by binary forms having roots of specified multiplicities. The symmetric group S 3 acts on (PV * ) 3 by permuting the factors, and X ∆ is the categorial quotient (PV * ) 3 /S 3 .…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence there is one concomitant each of type (8, 4, 1), (8,1,4). Now Φ 841 is necessarily equal to the product Φ 400 Φ 441 .…”
Section: ])mentioning
confidence: 99%