2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2014.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Erdős' extremal problem on matchings in hypergraphs

Abstract: In 1965 Erdős conjectured that the number of edges in k-uniform hypergraphs on n vertices in which the largest matching has s edges is maximized for hypergraphs of one of two special types. We settled this conjecture in the affirmative for k = 3 and n is large enough.Clearly, if s ≤ n/k, then Cov k (n, s) ⊆ H k (n, s). Furthermore, we define Cl k (n, s) as the family of all k-graphs G 2 = (V 2 , E 2 ) which consists of Date: February 16, 2012. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 05C35, 05C65, 05C70.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the cases k ≤ 4, it was verified asymptotically by Alon, Frankl, Huang, Rödl, Ruciński and Sudakov [1]. For k = 3, it was recently proved by Frankl [11], improving results of Frankl, Rödl and Ruciński [12], and of Luczak and Mieczkowska [21]. Bollobás, Daykin and Erdős [4] proved Conjecture 1.1 for general k whenever s < n/(2k 3 ), which extended earlier results of Erdős [8].…”
Section: Large Matchings In Hypergraphs With Many Edgessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For the cases k ≤ 4, it was verified asymptotically by Alon, Frankl, Huang, Rödl, Ruciński and Sudakov [1]. For k = 3, it was recently proved by Frankl [11], improving results of Frankl, Rödl and Ruciński [12], and of Luczak and Mieczkowska [21]. Bollobás, Daykin and Erdős [4] proved Conjecture 1.1 for general k whenever s < n/(2k 3 ), which extended earlier results of Erdős [8].…”
Section: Large Matchings In Hypergraphs With Many Edgessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For k = 2 (graphs) the value of n 0 (2, t) was determined by Erdős and Gallai [2]. The case k = 3 was recently investigated by Frankl, Rödl, and Rucinśki [10] and n 0 (3, t) was finally determined by Luczak and Mieczkowska [21] for large t, and by Frankl [6] for all t. In general, Huang, Loh, and Sudakov [16] showed n 0 (k, t) < 3tk 2 , which was slightly improved in [9] and greatly improved to n 0 (k, t) ≤ (2t + 1)k − t by Frankl [7]. Frankl [5] showed that for every n, k, t if a k-graph F on [n] has no t + 1 pairwise disjoint edges then |F| ≤ t n−1 k−1 .…”
Section: Given Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luczak, Mieczkowska [119] proved (20) in the case k = 3 and s very large. In [60] (20) is proved for k = 3 and all s.…”
Section: Proposition 31 (Frankl [56]) Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 93%