2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00233-009-9184-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On fractional resolvent operator functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and using the fact that R(t)R(s) = R(s)R(t) for all t, s ≥ 0 (which can be proved similarly as that of α-times resolvent family in [8]), one gets …”
Section: The Algebraic Equationmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and using the fact that R(t)R(s) = R(s)R(t) for all t, s ≥ 0 (which can be proved similarly as that of α-times resolvent family in [8]), one gets …”
Section: The Algebraic Equationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In particular, we show that if the Cauchy problem (1.2) admits an analytic solution families, then the problem (0.1) is also well-posed. In Section 4 we derive the algebraic equation for such resolvent families, similarly as we did in [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We establish the sufficient conditions for generation of global α-times C-regularized resolvent families (α > 1) in SCLCSs. In contrast to the recent papers of C. Chen, M. Li [3] and M. Li, C.-C. Li, F.-B. Li [13], the constructed resolvent families need not be exponentially equicontinuous, so that there is a certain novelty value in our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Peng and Li [10] proved that the α-order fractional semigroup is closely related to the solution operator of the Caputo fractional abstract Cauchy problem (1.1) (for the definition of solution operator, we refer to [2]). Moreover, the equality (1.7) is equivalent to the following equality In the special case when T (·) is exponentially bounded (hence it is Laplace transformable), taking Laplace transform on both sides of (1.5) with respect to s and t, we derive that…”
Section: Theorem 11 Assume That a Is The Generator Of The A-order Fmentioning
confidence: 99%