2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2019.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On g-extra conditional diagnosability of hierarchical cubic networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since failures of processors and links are inevitable in multiprocessor systems, fault tolerance is an important issue in interconnection networks. Fault tolerance of interconnection networks becomes an essential problem and has been widely studied, such as, structure connectivity and substructure connectivity of hypercubes [20], extra connectivity of bubble sort star graphs [10], g-extra conditional diagnosability of hierarchical cubic networks [21], g-good-neighbor connectivity of graphs [25], conditional connectivity of Cayley graphs generated by unicyclic graphs [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since failures of processors and links are inevitable in multiprocessor systems, fault tolerance is an important issue in interconnection networks. Fault tolerance of interconnection networks becomes an essential problem and has been widely studied, such as, structure connectivity and substructure connectivity of hypercubes [20], extra connectivity of bubble sort star graphs [10], g-extra conditional diagnosability of hierarchical cubic networks [21], g-good-neighbor connectivity of graphs [25], conditional connectivity of Cayley graphs generated by unicyclic graphs [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their important role in both network theory and practice, many diagnosability results have appeared in literature. Recent examples include g-extra diagnosability results for the hypercube [58], the arrangement graph [44], the bubble-sort graph [48], the (n, k)-star graph [37], and the hierarchical cubic network [36], all in terms of both PMC and/or MM* models. We notice that much of the ad hoc derivation details, as reported in those papers devoted to different structures are essentially shared among themselves, and even with the results on the g-good-neighbor diagnosability derived for these structures [13,40,45,47,50,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%