2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10587-014-0125-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Hardy q-inequalities

Abstract: Some q-analysis variants of Hardy type inequalities of the form b 0with sharp constant C are proved and discussed. A similar result with the Riemann-Liouville operator involved is also proved. Finally, it is pointed out that by using these techniques we can also obtain some new discrete Hardy and Copson type inequalities in the classical case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of articles address the further developments and recent results in the q-deformed calculus (see e.g. [3], [6], [10], [26], [37], [38] and we refer to the books [11] and [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of articles address the further developments and recent results in the q-deformed calculus (see e.g. [3], [6], [10], [26], [37], [38] and we refer to the books [11] and [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One interesting topic, q-analogues of the many inequalities derived from classical analysis, has been established. Its use can be seen in works such as [3,8,13,15,17]. These integral inequalities can be used for the study of qualitative and quantitative properties of integrals, see [1,14,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they proved that the constant C 0 is the sharp one. On the other hand, in [13] Maligranda, Oinarov and Persson derived some q-analysis variants of the classical Hardy inequality and obtained their corresponding best constants. Motivated by their work, a natural question raised is whether the q-analogue of a multivariate Hausdorff operator enjoys the same properties as the classical multivariate Hausdorff operator defined in (1.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both inequalities were proved independently by Gao [30, Corollary 3.1–3.2] (see also [31, Theorem 1.1] and [32, Theorem 6.1]) for and some special cases of α (this means that there are still some regions of parameters with no proof of (1.1)). Moreover, in [33, Theorems 2.1 and 2.3] proved another sharp discrete analogue of inequality (1.1) in the following form: and for , and , where .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%