On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History 2019
DOI: 10.1525/9780520911536-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0
12

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
99
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this theory, a person capable of leading has the personality traits (e.g., charm, confidence, intellect, communication skills, and social aptitude) of a leader from birth, which set them apart from others (i.e., the masses). Example of the hereditary trait leadership theory is Thomas Carlyle's Great Man Leadership [3]. Trait theories also view leadership ability as innate ('born') and based on distinctive physical and mental traits.…”
Section: ░ 2 Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this theory, a person capable of leading has the personality traits (e.g., charm, confidence, intellect, communication skills, and social aptitude) of a leader from birth, which set them apart from others (i.e., the masses). Example of the hereditary trait leadership theory is Thomas Carlyle's Great Man Leadership [3]. Trait theories also view leadership ability as innate ('born') and based on distinctive physical and mental traits.…”
Section: ░ 2 Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, notwithstanding these efforts, there is a rising worry in the literature that these ef-forts are not appropriately growing and sustaining the leadership volume essential in today's multifaceted organizations (e.g., Day & Dragoni, 2015).Usually, leadership development actions are aimed to enhance the universal knowledge, networks, skills, and abilities of individual leaders and managers (Day, 2001). These methods are therefore based on old-fashioned conceptualizations of leadership as the behaviours of individuals (e.g.,managers, CEOs) who direct, align, and motivate others in search of communal objectives and the growth of the company (e.g., Carlyle, 1907). Adding to that, the leadership literature has shown that leadership is both a interpersonal and multilevel issue, which involves not only leaders, but also supporters, and social relational processes linking followers of larger collectives and networks which show its tangible results (e.g., Eberly, Johnson, Hernandez, & Avolio, 2013).…”
Section: Servant Leadership and Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term of this theory has been originally associated with the historian Carlyle who analysed great historical leaders like Napoleon, Muhammad, Jesus Christ, Alexander the s Carlyle, 1841, p. 127). This theory suggests that there is an inimitable set of features that distinguish great men from ordinary people and make them natural leaders (Carlyle, 1993Harrison, 2018. It means that not everyone can be a leader because leadership is something that cannot be learned (Uslu, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%