2014
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnu181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Onp-adicL-Functions for GL (n) × GL (n-1) Over Totally Real Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statement (i) follows from Matsushima's Formula and our Proposition 2.3, a consequence of the Homological Base Change Theorem, and the fact that we may associate to an even finite order character ξ a cohomology class of degree 0, such that cup product with this class realizes the twist with ξ. Fruthermore, if ξ is odd, or if φ is a non-cohomological cusp form in (69) generating an irreducible representation, the form φ ξ (g) := ξ(det(g)) · φ(g) lies again in (69) by Arthur-Clozel [2], is K-finite if and only if φ is K-finite, and thus this correspondence may serve as the bridge to transport any normalization of the rational structure on the subspace of cohomoligcal forms to the space of non-cohomological forms. For an explicit exposition of the Eichler-Shimura map realizing Matsushima's formula in the case of totally real F (yet valid in general), we refer to Section 6.2 in [29]. Finally the uniqueness statement is a consequence of the construction and the uniqueness statement (f).…”
Section: Automorphic Representations Of Gl(n)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statement (i) follows from Matsushima's Formula and our Proposition 2.3, a consequence of the Homological Base Change Theorem, and the fact that we may associate to an even finite order character ξ a cohomology class of degree 0, such that cup product with this class realizes the twist with ξ. Fruthermore, if ξ is odd, or if φ is a non-cohomological cusp form in (69) generating an irreducible representation, the form φ ξ (g) := ξ(det(g)) · φ(g) lies again in (69) by Arthur-Clozel [2], is K-finite if and only if φ is K-finite, and thus this correspondence may serve as the bridge to transport any normalization of the rational structure on the subspace of cohomoligcal forms to the space of non-cohomological forms. For an explicit exposition of the Eichler-Shimura map realizing Matsushima's formula in the case of totally real F (yet valid in general), we refer to Section 6.2 in [29]. Finally the uniqueness statement is a consequence of the construction and the uniqueness statement (f).…”
Section: Automorphic Representations Of Gl(n)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Recall that Y = Res C/R X and Y ′ is the base change of Y to C. In the infinitesimally unitary case the existence of the isomorphism (29) implies that decomposition (21) reads…”
Section: Frobenius-schur Indicators In the Infinitesimally Unitary Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that in the ordinary case the p-adic measure is uniquely determined by the evaluation at sufficiently ramified characters (cf. [Jan14]).…”
Section: Xn(k)[c]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. The proof proceeds as the proof of Theorem 4.5 in [Jan14]. The main ingredient being Theorem 7.1 for the computation of c(χ p , −) in the ramified case.…”
Section: Xn(k)[c]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation