1980
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90037-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On inhibition between spatial frequency channels: Adaptation to complex gratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3f, 9f) was less than that elicited by sequential adaptation. Tolhurst (1972) and Nachmias et al (1973) found that adaptation to squarewave gratings caused less effect at the component frequencies than that caused by sinewave adaptation to those frequencies, and Stromeyer and Klein (1974) and Klein and Stromeyer (1980) report that the decreased effect could be the result of inhibition between edge (asymmetric) and line (symmetric) mechanisms. These findings and those reported in the present paper seem to suggest that local aspects of the luminance profile (edges) are important in adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3f, 9f) was less than that elicited by sequential adaptation. Tolhurst (1972) and Nachmias et al (1973) found that adaptation to squarewave gratings caused less effect at the component frequencies than that caused by sinewave adaptation to those frequencies, and Stromeyer and Klein (1974) and Klein and Stromeyer (1980) report that the decreased effect could be the result of inhibition between edge (asymmetric) and line (symmetric) mechanisms. These findings and those reported in the present paper seem to suggest that local aspects of the luminance profile (edges) are important in adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at a high curvature boundary, smaller scales can better track the boundary and cooperate with each other, whereas larger scales generate a spatially scattered response and suppress each other through spatial competition. See Griffiths and Chubb ( 1993), Klein and Stromeyer ( 1980), Quinn ( 1985), Sagi and Hochstein ( 1984), and Wilson and Richards (1989) and cortical neurophysiology (Lennie, 1984;Livingstone &Ru-bel, 1984, are proposed to carry out the capture property. These double-opponent cells occur, moreover, at the monocular FIDOs, whose surface representations are amodal (viz., not visible).…”
Section: Filling-in Of Monocular Surface Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the test and first adaptor, had a spatial frequency of 7.5 c/deg, almost an octave above our 4 c/deg standard test grating. Second, as Klein and Stromeyer (1980) were interested in the interactions between harmonically related frequencies (of a squarewave) they used adapting contrasts that differed by a factor of three, 639/o for 2.5 c/deg and 21% for 7.5 cideg, whereas we used an adapting contrast of 7046 for both fixed and variable adapting gratings. The adaptation effect in their experiment was fairly small (about 0.2 log unit) owning to the low adapting contrast at the 7.5 c/deg frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the weak effect of a squarewave adapting grating on the third harmonic frequency (Tolhurst, 1972;Nachmias et al, 1973) could be due to the fact that the edges of the squarewave grating may be less effective in adapting mechanisms which would normally respond to one or more harmonic frequencies of the squarewave Magnussen, 1987, 1988;von der Heydt rf ai., 1986;von der Heydt, 1987). Klein and Stromeyer (1980) have shown that the first and third harmonics of a squarewave can be effective adaptors. if they are "separately visible" during adaptation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%