“…Corach et al in [7] generalized (1.1) and many of its relatives to the case that (1.2) aba = aca, see also [20,21,22,23]. Recently, it has been realized that there are proper counterparts of Jacobson's lemma for Drazin inverse and generalized Drazin inverse under the new condition (1.3) acd = dbd, dba = aca, see [15,18]. Obviously, the case "a = d" in (1.3) gives (1.2), the case "b = c" in (1.2) results in aca = aca.…”