On Judgments of Approximately Equal

Abstract

Although precision is often important in quantitative judgment, sometimes, it is valuable to recognize that two quantities are roughly the same. Fuzzy-trace theory suggests that approximately equal judgments rely on gist representations (i.e., meaningful fuzzy categories of quantity). We conducted three experiments to investigate approximately equal judgments with number pairs presented in different formats, both with and without semantic content (breast cancer statistics). In each study, the ratio of the smaller divided by larger number predicted approximately equal judgments. Experiment 1 also examined how knowledge of breast cancer, presentation format (frequencies vs. percentages), and differences in gist comprehension of breast cancer information influence fuzzy equality judgments. As predicted by the fuzzy-trace theory concept of denominator neglect, approximately equal judgments were more sensitive, as measured by signal detection theory (SDT) analyses, when presented as percentages. In both experiments with breast cancer statistics, people were more likely to judge number pairs approximately equal when they were embedded in sentences about breast cancer, and breast cancer knowledge predicted increased perception of equality, when appropriately consistent with reliable sources, and increased judgment sensitivity. In Experiment 2, a simple intervention focusing on gist meaning increased source-consistent approximately equal judgments, increased SDT judgment sensitivity, and decreased SDT response bias. In Experiment 3, using number pairs devoid of semantic context spanning four orders of magnitude, we further examined ratio similarity. Overall, more knowledgeable judges and those who better understood the gist of meaningful numbers were more likely to judge literally different numbers as "approximately equal" rather than make precise discriminations that were meaningless.

Supporting Health and Medical Decision Making: Findings and Insights from Fuzzy-Trace Theory

“…This is not just a question of psychophysics. 52 Most decision theories assume expectancy-value tradeoffs. These theories treat options differing categorically or differing in degree the same way mathematically, as tradeoffs between gradations of probabilities and outcome magnitudes, but FTT does not.…”

How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach

“…Qualitatively different outcomes are not just the result of arbitrary binning of quantities; instead, they are meaningfully different categories. Ordinal gist reflects “fuzzy, inexact numerical judgments” (Szkudlarek & Brannon, 2017, p. 12) that involve approximate comparisons of outcome magnitudes, such as more versus less (Wolfe, Reyna, & Smith, 2018). Verbatim representations are precise representations of presented numbers.…”

Risky choice framing with various problem descriptions: A replication and extension study

“…Categorical gist represents outcomes according to qualitative distinctions, for instance, "some quantity" versus "none"; "good" versus "bad." Ordinal gist involves approximate comparisons of outcome magnitudes, such as "more" versus "less" (Wolfe, Reyna & Smith, 2018). The theory proposes that adults rely on the simplest gist when processing information, beginning with the lowest level of gist (categorical), and recruit higher (more precise) levels for decision making only if the lower levels do not provide sufficient discrimination between the options (Reyna, Wilhelms, Mccormick & Weldon, 2016).…”