2016
DOI: 10.1002/mma.3954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Korn's first inequality for tangential or normal boundary conditions with explicit constants

Abstract: We will prove that for piecewise C2‐concave domains in double-struckRN Korn's first inequality holds for vector fields satisfying homogeneous normal or tangential boundary conditions with explicit Korn constant 2. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…being valid for all vector fields E ∈ H Γ (grad, Ω), the closure of Ω-compactly supported test fields, see (15). Using a more sophisticated integration by parts formula from [12,Corollary 6], which has been proved already in, e.g., [28,Theorem 2.3] for the case of full boundary conditions, we see that (26) remains true for polyhedral domains Ω and for vector fields…”
Section: Discussion Of the Numerical Results And Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…being valid for all vector fields E ∈ H Γ (grad, Ω), the closure of Ω-compactly supported test fields, see (15). Using a more sophisticated integration by parts formula from [12,Corollary 6], which has been proved already in, e.g., [28,Theorem 2.3] for the case of full boundary conditions, we see that (26) remains true for polyhedral domains Ω and for vector fields…”
Section: Discussion Of the Numerical Results And Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Now, Theorem 2.14 implies that the crucial assumption (13) holds for the operators A n of the de Rham complex (14), cf. the general complex (12). More precisely, by Theorem 2.14…”
Section: We Summarisementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Throughout this paper and unless otherwise explicitly stated, let Ω ⊂ R N , N ≥ 2, be a bounded domain with strong Lipschitz boundary Γ := ∂Ω, i.e., locally Γ can be represented as a graph of a Lipschitz function. As in [2], we introduce the standard scalar valued Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces by L 2 (Ω) and H 1 (Ω) as well as , respectively, where • C ∞ (Ω) denotes the test functions yielding the usual Sobolev space • H 1 (Ω) with zero boundary traces. These definitions extend component-wise to vector or matrix, or more general tensor fields and we will use the same notations for these spaces.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaffney inequality can be deduced from the Friedrichs inequality. To our knowledge, such inequalities hold for convex and Lipschitz domains; among the others, we refer to [2,16,15,1], see also [4] and the references listed in. In this paper, we first prove Friedrichs inequality for (ε, δ) domains, and then prove Gaffney inequality by adapting the methods of [5] (developed for Korn inequality) to this framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%