2003
DOI: 10.1086/377365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Large-Scale Magnetic Field Reversals in the Outer Galaxy

Abstract: We combine the observations of rotation measures of extragalactic radio sources from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey and pulsars to investigate the question of magnetic field reversals in the outer Galaxy. Our results are consistent with there being no reversal in the Galactic magnetic field beyond the solar radius. We reconcile our conclusions with the results of previous studies that have been used to argue the presence of such reversals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their modeling, Brown et al (2007) assumed that the strength of the large-scale field decreases with Galactocentric radius, following results by Heiles (1996), Beck (2001), and Brown et al (2003). However, we do not find strong evidence for a systematic variation with galactocentric radius of the strength of the large-scale field.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In their modeling, Brown et al (2007) assumed that the strength of the large-scale field decreases with Galactocentric radius, following results by Heiles (1996), Beck (2001), and Brown et al (2003). However, we do not find strong evidence for a systematic variation with galactocentric radius of the strength of the large-scale field.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The region boundaries are delineated by the green spirals in Figure 4. The constraints for the model field within each arm or interarm region are (1) a logspiral with a pitch angle of 11.5 as shown, (2) a field strength that is inversely proportional to Galactic radius (e.g., Heiles 1996b; Beck 2001;Brown et al 2003b), (3) a zero vertical component, and (4) a coherent direction within each region. We set the magnetic field within the molecular ring to have the same constraints as in the arms, except that the field is assumed to be purely azimuthal.…”
Section: Modeling the Large-scale Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the blob is a Perseus arm object like W5, a positive RM FS is preferred, because of the larger c value. Brown et al (2003b) examined the RM values of extragalactic sources and pulsars in the direction of 105 • ≤ ≤ 135 • within the Galactic plane and found that most values are negative. However, Mitra et al (2003) showed a schematic model (their Fig.…”
Section: W5 ( = 137mentioning
confidence: 99%