1995
DOI: 10.1039/ja9951000661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line analysis of elemental pollutants in gaseous effluents by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry: thermodynamic aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few decades, a number of significant strides have been made toward the detection of hazardous elements based on various techniques, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), optical emission spectrometry (OES), x-ray fluorescence, laser induced fluorescence, mass spectrometry, etc. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Still, the whole process of contaminant detection and quantification chiefly relies on lab-based instruments, for example, gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS), inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), or ICP-MS techniques. As a routine procedure, samples are collected from sites, processed, and then sent to labs elsewhere for evaluation and testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few decades, a number of significant strides have been made toward the detection of hazardous elements based on various techniques, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), optical emission spectrometry (OES), x-ray fluorescence, laser induced fluorescence, mass spectrometry, etc. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Still, the whole process of contaminant detection and quantification chiefly relies on lab-based instruments, for example, gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS), inductively coupled plasmaoptical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), or ICP-MS techniques. As a routine procedure, samples are collected from sites, processed, and then sent to labs elsewhere for evaluation and testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, continuous emission monitors (CEMs) have been developed and applied to measure heavy metals emission in real-time in different combustion systems, such as incinerator and coal gasification plants, for atmospheric pollution control. A number of instrumental techniques have been applied to CEMs, including inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), [9][10][11][12] and microwave plasma system. 13,14 The advantages and disadvantages of each individual analytical technique have been compared and discussed elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the physical states of calibration aerosols could be generated to closely resemble that of sample aerosols, the gaseous matrix compositions between standard aerosols and samples are not exactly the same. Trassey and associates 3,15 investigated the effect of gas compositions such as CO 2 and H 2 O on plasma emission in theory and by experiment concluding that matrix matching between samples and standards is absolutely necessary to achieve a high accuracy of analytical results. The introduction of air samples into an argon plasma results in mixed-gas plasma, hence changing the thermodynamic properties of the plasma gas such as electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and specific heat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to fulfill the need for multimetals continuous emissions monitors (MMCEMs), several innovative analytical methods have been developed and demonstrated with varying degrees of success. Executed on an extractive basis or in situ, these methods employ a variety of spectrochemical techniques including inductively coupled plasma emission, [1][2][3] microwave plasma emission, 4 laser-induced plasma emission, 5,6 and X-ray fluorescence analysis. 7 In anticipation of these developmental efforts, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has drafted performance specifications for MMCEMs that stipulate certain minimum requirements for relative accuracy and quality assurance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%