2007
DOI: 10.1021/pr070313u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Line LC−MS Approach Combining Collision-Induced Dissociation (CID), Electron-Transfer Dissociation (ETD), and CID of an Isolated Charge-Reduced Species for the Trace-Level Characterization of Proteins with Post-Translational Modifications

Abstract: We have expanded our recent on-line LC-MS platform for large peptide analysis to combine collision-induced dissociation (CID), electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), and CID of an isolated charge-reduced (CRCID) species derived from ETD to determine sites of phosphorylation and glycosylation modifications, as well as the sequence of large peptide fragments (i.e., 2000-10,000 Da) from complex proteins, such as beta-casein, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) at the lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
159
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By optimizing fragmentation energy to release O-GlcNAc (m/z 204.1), O-GlcNAc-modified peptides can be detected by ESI-MS, which has been employed in mapping O-GlcNAcylation sites in human cytomegalovirus tegument basic phosphoprotein (UL32) to serine 921 and serine 952 (Greis et al 1994). In contrast to CID, electron capture dissociation and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) are alternative fragmentation methods used to preserve more labile modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, glycosylation, nitrosylation, and sulfation, and allow for direct mapping of peptide/protein modifications (Mikesh et al 2006;Syka et al 2004;Udeshi et al 2007Udeshi et al , 2008Wu et al 2007;Wang et al 2010a;Sobott et al 2009). ETD fragmentation cleaves along the peptide backbone between the Cα-N producing c and z ions while still maintaining peptide side chains and modifications (Syka et al 2004;Sobott et al 2009).…”
Section: Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By optimizing fragmentation energy to release O-GlcNAc (m/z 204.1), O-GlcNAc-modified peptides can be detected by ESI-MS, which has been employed in mapping O-GlcNAcylation sites in human cytomegalovirus tegument basic phosphoprotein (UL32) to serine 921 and serine 952 (Greis et al 1994). In contrast to CID, electron capture dissociation and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) are alternative fragmentation methods used to preserve more labile modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, glycosylation, nitrosylation, and sulfation, and allow for direct mapping of peptide/protein modifications (Mikesh et al 2006;Syka et al 2004;Udeshi et al 2007Udeshi et al , 2008Wu et al 2007;Wang et al 2010a;Sobott et al 2009). ETD fragmentation cleaves along the peptide backbone between the Cα-N producing c and z ions while still maintaining peptide side chains and modifications (Syka et al 2004;Sobott et al 2009).…”
Section: Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ETD LTQ XL MS/MS experiments of off-line fractionated IgA1 HR glycopeptides, a range of ETD parameters was tested to optimize fragmentation, and the data were compared with results derived from AI-ECD LTQ FT MS/MS for the same IgA1 HR O-glycoforms. Varied parameters included inclusion of supplemental activation (SA) or not, inclusion of CID of the charge-reduced species (34), and settings for the anion (fluoranthene) injection time (50 -500 ms). AGC was set to 1 ϫ 10 4 for analyte cations and 1.5 ϫ 10 5 for fluoranthene anions.…”
Section: Ai-ecd Ft-icr Ms/ms and Etd Ltq Ft Ms/msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ETD reagent anions from fluoranthene were generated in a chemical ionization source (reagent gas: CH 4 ) and injected into the ion trap to react with the stored ionized peptides under defined conditions: 100-to 120-ms reaction time for electron transfer, active ion counting mode (ICC), and no additional delay between ETD and CRCID events. The principal difference between typically used automated CRCID (also known as supplemental activation, smart decomposition, or postactivation; subsequently referred to as autoCRCID) and the manual CRCID performed here is characterized by the ability to vary the amplitude of the activation voltage pulse and to isolate singly charged radical species before ion activation, in contrast to multiply charged radical species isolation already used in proteomics [35]. The mass spectra were acquired with a 1-min acquisition period and represent averaging over close to 100 scans; data analysis was carried out using Bruker's Data Analysis (version 3.4) software (Bruker Daltonics).…”
Section: Etd-based Tandem Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%