2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line measurement of ultrafine aggregate surface area and volume distributions by electrical mobility analysis: I. Theoretical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the highest soot concentrations are found under fuelrich flame conditions. The overall soot volume can be computed from the SMPS number size distribution by accounting for the aggregate non-sphericity as in Lall and Friedlander (2006), assuming a soot primary particle diameter of 20 nm (Mamakos et al 2013). This soot volume is shown to correlate well with the bulk adiabatic flame temperature from chemical equilibrium calculations when the soot size exceeds 30 nm diameter (Figure 3).…”
Section: Soot Size and Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the highest soot concentrations are found under fuelrich flame conditions. The overall soot volume can be computed from the SMPS number size distribution by accounting for the aggregate non-sphericity as in Lall and Friedlander (2006), assuming a soot primary particle diameter of 20 nm (Mamakos et al 2013). This soot volume is shown to correlate well with the bulk adiabatic flame temperature from chemical equilibrium calculations when the soot size exceeds 30 nm diameter (Figure 3).…”
Section: Soot Size and Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…involve simplifying assumptions about the size distribution of the primary particles (often assumed to be monodisperse), the angular distribution of the primaries relative to the center of mass (often assumed to be uniform), the extent to which "inner" primary particles are shielded from interactions with the carrier gas by other primary particles in the agglomerate, and the transport regime (free molecular, continuum, transition) (SchmidtOtt et al 1990;Chakrabarty et al 2007;Lall and Friedlander 2006). Efforts have also been made to theoretically account for those dependencies (Naumann 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured primary particle size as well as the measured agglomerate number distribution are introduced into the Lall et al (2006a) model. The agglomerate number concentration distribution as function of mobility diameter is corrected for the effect of the different charge distribution for chain like loose agglomerates compared with spheres using the Wen et al (1984a, b) model.…”
Section: Existing Technologies and Data Evaluation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to unavoidable coagulation and unwanted or wanted sintering processes they often occur in form of loose agglomerates consisting out of primary particles touching each other in one point or sintered aggregates with stronger chemical bonds. In this paper we will not only consider loose agglomerates as has been done in the past (Lall and Friedlander, 2006a;Lall et al, 2006b;Wang et al, 2010), but we will consider data evaluation procedures for the structurally more complicated aggregates. Although the primary particles in agglomerates can have different shapes (spheres, fibers, plates) depending on the material and the synthesis process, very often they are spherical with diameters of a few nanometer to below 100 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%