2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(99)00105-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On local gouging in five-axis sculptured surface machining using flat-end tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• Allowable deviation of the machined surface M from S, referred to as machining tolerance ε, is positive and consistent with that in the finishing stage (Rao and Sarma 2000).…”
Section: Basic Assumptions and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Allowable deviation of the machined surface M from S, referred to as machining tolerance ε, is positive and consistent with that in the finishing stage (Rao and Sarma 2000).…”
Section: Basic Assumptions and Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The published algorithms can be classified broadly into local and global methods (Fan and Ball 2008). In the local methods (Vickers and Quan 1989, Bedi et al 1997, Rao and Sarma 2000, Jensen et al 2002, Yoon et al 2002, only normal curvatures of C (or W i ) and S are considered to orient C. The main disadvantage of the local methods is that there could still be rear gouging, and consequently a secondary iterative gouge-check and correction algorithm has to be implemented (Gray et al 2005). The global methods overcome the disadvantage by using an area of S beneath C to determine the orientation (Warkentin et al 2000, Gray et al 2003, Hosseinkhani et al 2007, Fan and Ball 2008.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result must be a collision free trajectory with optimized tool/surface positioning in order to guarantee the conformity of the part with respect to the required quality [1].…”
Section: Fig 1 5-axis Digital Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G-code is derived from a toolpath The toolpath optimization usually aims to reduce the total length of the toolpath or the total machining time, maintaining the prescribed accuracy. Alternatively, the user may wish to improve the accuracy while keeping or even reducing the machining time [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%