2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.08.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On local search in d.c. optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches using a local linearization of either the function f (·, ·) or the function ϕ(·), see e.g. Strekalovsky [35] and Tuy and Ghannadan [36] can be used in special cases.…”
Section: Definition 32 (Mordukhovichmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches using a local linearization of either the function f (·, ·) or the function ϕ(·), see e.g. Strekalovsky [35] and Tuy and Ghannadan [36] can be used in special cases.…”
Section: Definition 32 (Mordukhovichmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known [13][14][15]25,26] that in nonconvex problems, in particular, in D.C. programming problems, the classical convex optimization methods (as conjugate gradient, Newtonian, trust region methods etc.) turn out to be inefficient, in general, for reaching a global solution.…”
Section: A Special Local Search Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is unknown in advance whether the sets may be separated with a sphere or not, the minimization of the classification error function arises here naturally [10]. This minimization problem turns out to be nonsmooth and nonconvex [12][13][14][15][16], that leads us to a nonconvex variational problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations