Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2739480.2754774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Maintaining Diversity in MOEA/D

Abstract: Moea/d is a generic decomposition-based multiobjective optimization framework which has been proved to be extremely effective in solving a broad range of optimization problems especially for continuous domains. In this paper, we consider applying Moea/d to solve a bi-objective scheduling combinatorial problem in which task durations and due-dates are uncertain. Surprisingly, we find that the conventional Moea/d implementation provides poor performance in our application setting. We show that this is because th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also methods aimed at maximising the average agreement index: the memetic algorithm from [34], the co-evolutionary method from [35], here for a fuzzy job shop with multi-process routes, and the multiobjective genetic algorithm from [36], which also attempts to minimise the number of tardy jobs. There are also several multi-objective approaches that attempt to maximise the minimum or the average agreement index together with minimising of the makespan: with a fuzzy decision making approach [37,38], a lexicographical approach [39] or a Pareto-front approximation approach [40][41][42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also methods aimed at maximising the average agreement index: the memetic algorithm from [34], the co-evolutionary method from [35], here for a fuzzy job shop with multi-process routes, and the multiobjective genetic algorithm from [36], which also attempts to minimise the number of tardy jobs. There are also several multi-objective approaches that attempt to maximise the minimum or the average agreement index together with minimising of the makespan: with a fuzzy decision making approach [37,38], a lexicographical approach [39] or a Pareto-front approximation approach [40][41][42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been studies demonstrating the potential of using decomposition-based methods for solving static JSS problems [37,108,167,235,279], to the best of our knowledge, there is no study using MOEA/D for solving the MO-DFJSS problem. In this context, it is intriguing to investigate whether incorporating MOEA/D with GP can evolve a Pareto front of superior scheduling heuristics compared to the current state-of-the-art multi-objective algorithm for MO-DFJSS.…”
Section: Multi-objective Gpmentioning
confidence: 99%