2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective Local Search Based on Decomposition

Abstract: International audienceIt is generally believed that Local search (Ls) should be used as a basic tool in multi-objective evolutionary computation for combi-natorial optimization. However, not much effort has been made to investigate how to efficiently use Ls in multi-objective evolutionary computation algorithms. In this paper, we study some issues in the use of cooperative scalarizing local search approaches for decomposition-based multi-objective combinatorial optimization. We propose and study multiple move … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It decomposes a multi-objective optimisation problem (MOP) into a number of singleobjective optimisation sub-problems on the basis of a set of weights (or called weight vectors) and then uses a search heuristic to optimise these sub-problems simultaneously and cooperatively. Compared with conventional Pareto-based EMO, decomposition-based EMO has clear strengths, e.g., providing high selection pressure toward the Pareto front [1], being easy to work with local search operators [2][3][4], owning high search ability for combinatorial MOPs [5][6][7][8], and being capable of dealing with MOPs with many objectives [9][10][11][12] and MOPs with a complicated Pareto set [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It decomposes a multi-objective optimisation problem (MOP) into a number of singleobjective optimisation sub-problems on the basis of a set of weights (or called weight vectors) and then uses a search heuristic to optimise these sub-problems simultaneously and cooperatively. Compared with conventional Pareto-based EMO, decomposition-based EMO has clear strengths, e.g., providing high selection pressure toward the Pareto front [1], being easy to work with local search operators [2][3][4], owning high search ability for combinatorial MOPs [5][6][7][8], and being capable of dealing with MOPs with many objectives [9][10][11][12] and MOPs with a complicated Pareto set [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derbel et al [2] investigate the hybridization of single-objective local search move strategies within the MOEA/D framework. Besides, the multiobjective memetic algorithm based on decomposition (MOMAD) proposed by Ke et al [7] is one of the state-of-the-art algorithms for MCOPs.…”
Section: Related Work and Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in [12] the decomposition is based on cone separation and it only can be applied to the problems with not more than three objectives. Derbel et al [13] combined the single-objective local search move strategies with the MOEA/D framework to optimize the bi-objective traveling salesman problems. Ke et al [14] proposed the Multiobjective Memetic Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOMAD), which is one of the state-of-the-art algorithms for MCOPs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%