2014
DOI: 10.1080/15598608.2013.828338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Minimum Variance Optimal Controlled Sampling: A Simplified Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We collected data from employees in NH that either have or do not have the E-Qalin certificate by using convenient sampling. Despite the fact that random sampling is often considered the gold standard of research sampling strategies, due to its ability to influence biases and the possibility to evaluate the reliability of the resulting estimates ( Tiwari and Chilwal, 2014 ) researchers are often faced with a trade-off between the desire for randomization and pragmatic considerations when deciding on the sample. As was in the case of our research, random sampling is not always feasible and possible in practice given our constraints in time and resources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected data from employees in NH that either have or do not have the E-Qalin certificate by using convenient sampling. Despite the fact that random sampling is often considered the gold standard of research sampling strategies, due to its ability to influence biases and the possibility to evaluate the reliability of the resulting estimates ( Tiwari and Chilwal, 2014 ) researchers are often faced with a trade-off between the desire for randomization and pragmatic considerations when deciding on the sample. As was in the case of our research, random sampling is not always feasible and possible in practice given our constraints in time and resources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of selecting an appropriate sample, researchers face certain dilemmas. Namely, random sampling is traditionally considered as the gold standard in order to achieve sample impartiality, which is directly against the background of obtaining reliable estimates [ 114 ]. Yet the trade-off between the desire to randomize the sample on the one hand, and pragmatization on the other, is one of the leading challenges in the decision making process of the subject issue.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected data from employees from public and private health care institutions utilising a combination of convenience and snowball (nonrandom) sampling. Although random sampling is considered as the gold standard of sampling strategies due to its unbiasedness and the possibility to evaluate the reliability (accuracy) of the resulting estimates (Banerjee & Chaudhury, 2010;Tiwari & Chilwal, 2014), researchers are often faced with a trade-off between the desire for randomisation and pragmatic considerations when choosing their sample. Random sampling is not always possible nor feasible in practice, due to potential constraints in time, resources and costs.…”
Section: Sample and Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%