2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Modeling the Physical World as a Collection of Things: The W3C Thing Description Ontology

Abstract: This document presents the Thing Description ontology, an axiomatization of the W3C Thing Description model. It also introduces an alignment with the Semantic Sensor Network ontology and evaluates how this alignment contributes to semantic interoperability in the Web of Things.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the recent appearance of the standard, the literature on W3C WoT is still scarce and limited to few applications and supporting tools. The mapping of real-world IoT devices to W3C WTs have been explored in [16], [17], [18] and [19], respectively for the case of mobile phones, automotive industry and wireless sensor networks. Specifically, in the latter, the authors demonstrate how to deploy WoT-based interoperable sensing applications able to manage heterogeneous sensors equipped with three different wireless access technologies (Wi-Fi, BLE and Zigbee).…”
Section: A W3c Web Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the recent appearance of the standard, the literature on W3C WoT is still scarce and limited to few applications and supporting tools. The mapping of real-world IoT devices to W3C WTs have been explored in [16], [17], [18] and [19], respectively for the case of mobile phones, automotive industry and wireless sensor networks. Specifically, in the latter, the authors demonstrate how to deploy WoT-based interoperable sensing applications able to manage heterogeneous sensors equipped with three different wireless access technologies (Wi-Fi, BLE and Zigbee).…”
Section: A W3c Web Of Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interoperability support is managed at the application level by defining a standard interface for IoT components (physical or virtual), known as the Thing Description (TD) [15], which formally states the Web Things' (WTs) capabilities or affordances. Despite the recent appearance, some interesting applications of the W3C WoT have been proposed so far on different IoT domains [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]. At the same time, the WoT reference implementation [21] does not support mobility of software components among cloud/edge nodes, since the runtime environment of a WT (called Servient in [21]) must be statically deployed on a device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this promise depends on achieving semantic interoperability across connected devices. The recently proposed W3C WoT Thing Description ontology [33] takes advantage of the standardized Semantic Sensor Network Ontology 6 to provide the first layer of semantics. However, continuous efforts are necessary to align other well-established ontologies with the WoT.…”
Section: A Web Of Things (Wot)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some services, linked data service descriptions will be made available by the service provider. This might be the case for a physical asset, where a Web of Things 'Thing Description' document could be provided on the asset itself or via a proxy to give a JSON-LD Linked Data description of the device's affordances, or its capabilities and how it is to be used, "in order to increase interoperability between connected devices and develop arbitrarily complex mashups" [21]. Similarly, a dataset might be accompanied by a Linked Data description.…”
Section: A Sparql Rdf and Json-ldmentioning
confidence: 99%