2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2019)180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On monopole bubbling contributions to ’t Hooft loops

Abstract: Monopole bubbling contributions to supersymmetric 't Hooft loops in 4d N = 2 theories are computed by SQM indices. As recently argued, those indices are hard to compute due to the presence of Coulomb vacua that are not captured by standard localization techniques. We propose an algorithmic method to compute the full bubbling contributions that circumvent this issue, by considering SQM with more matter fields and isolating the bubbling terms as residues in flavor fugacities. The enlarged SQMs are read from bran… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found in examples that the inclusion of such contributions computed in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation reproduces the predictions from the AGT correspondence [4,5,6,16,17,8]. Later the authors of [18] proposed that the contributions from the non-compact branches are automatically included if one uses a modified SQM which arises by completing the brane configuration using a 5-brane web; they confirmed their proposal by working out more examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was found in examples that the inclusion of such contributions computed in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation reproduces the predictions from the AGT correspondence [4,5,6,16,17,8]. Later the authors of [18] proposed that the contributions from the non-compact branches are automatically included if one uses a modified SQM which arises by completing the brane configuration using a 5-brane web; they confirmed their proposal by working out more examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It seems possible to make statements similar to conjectures (i) and (ii) in the introduction for dyonic line operators. Our analysis in Section 5 and the study of dyonic operators in [18] suggest that there exist SQMs that capture magnetic screening contributions for dyonic operators, and that they involve a 1d Chern-Simons coupling (Wilson loop). In the special case where dyonic operators arise from integrating out hypermultiplets in the presence of 't Hooft operators, (5.4) can be interpreted wall-crossing for dyonic operators.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the right hand side the ζdependence is captured by the use of complexified Fenchel-Nielsen coordinates on M ζ . 2 Here the expectation value above is expressed as a sum over monopole bubbling configurations where cosh(v, b)F (a) v encodes the contribution of bulk fields and Z mono (a, m, ǫ; P, v) describes the contribution from the SQM that arises on the 't Hooft defect from bubbling [4]. See [4][5][6] for more background and explanation of notation.…”
Section: Technical Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%