2019
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2019.1566486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On multiple agencies: when do things matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The software routines, coupled with their size, makes tablets convenient. Writing on sociomateriality and affordance, Erofeeva (2019) argues that “in order to assess the relevance of objects, we need to conceptualise their relations to other objects present in a situation” (p. 601). This becomes evident here, where smartphones and tablets are discussed in relation to other available devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The software routines, coupled with their size, makes tablets convenient. Writing on sociomateriality and affordance, Erofeeva (2019) argues that “in order to assess the relevance of objects, we need to conceptualise their relations to other objects present in a situation” (p. 601). This becomes evident here, where smartphones and tablets are discussed in relation to other available devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, “a frame is inherent in the physical nature of an object” (Cress, 2015, p. 385). It is possible to identify an overlap between Cress’s perspective, as I understand it, and the concept of affordance, as brought forth in relation to sociomaterial theory (Erofeeva, 2019; Leonardi, 2017). For example, Leonardi (2017) puts forth that “people have perceptions, artifacts have materiality, and affordances or constraints are created when people construct perceptions of an artifact’s materiality” (p. 285).…”
Section: Theoretical and Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been argued by actor-network theorists and posthumanist scholars, instead of objects of use, all non-human artifacts, i.e. man-made objects, devices, systems etc., can be thought of as actants in care relations and practices that reshape the human lifeworld [19,20,21,22]. In other words, socio-technicality cannot be avoided when technology is explored as an aspect of care relations.…”
Section: Ehrs As Part Of Eldercare Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When humans repeatedly interact with the material and symbolic properties of technology, such as EHRs, the interactions will over time become structured processes [23], whereby the dynamic nature of technological applications and their situated use in care work can be analysed. For a recent commentary on theories on socio-technicality, see Erofeeva [19].…”
Section: Ehrs As Part Of Eldercare Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User Experience (UX) design is a design paradigm that focuses on improving the user's experience with a product throughout its entire life cycle.5 Another theoretical shift in conversation-analytic approaches to technologies occupies the high-ontology segment of the conceptualization of artefacts: objects as sets of affordances or autonomous interactants. For a discussion of the conceptual and methodological implications of this shift, see[Erofeeva, 2019;Klowait, 2019].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%