Transcendental Dynamics and Complex Analysis 2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511735233.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On multiply connected wandering domains of entire functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We use Theorem 1.2 to show that in Baker's original example of a multiply connected wandering domain, that is, the example given by (1.1) and (1.2), the connectivity is infinite and the boundary is not uniformly perfect. The question whether the connectivity of this domain is finite or infinite was raised by Baker [5] and by Kisaka and Shishikura [12]; the question was repeated in [8, p. 2946] and [16, p. 312].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Theorem 1.2 to show that in Baker's original example of a multiply connected wandering domain, that is, the example given by (1.1) and (1.2), the connectivity is infinite and the boundary is not uniformly perfect. The question whether the connectivity of this domain is finite or infinite was raised by Baker [5] and by Kisaka and Shishikura [12]; the question was repeated in [8, p. 2946] and [16, p. 312].…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, we define h − n (t) by interchanging + and − in the definition of h + n (t). By an argument and a calculation similar to those in [5], there exist functions h + (t) and h − (t) and t 0 > 0 such that h + n (t) → h + (t) and h − n (t) → h − (t) uniformly on compact subsets of {t | t ≥ t 0 }. In addition, (1) lim t→∞ |h ± (t)| = ∞, (2) lim n→∞ |f n (h ± (t))| = ∞ for all t ≥ t 0 and (3) h ± (t) is injective with respect to t. We denote {h + (t) | t ≥ t 0 } and {h − (t) | t ≥ t 0 } by H + and H − , respectively.…”
Section: B Has Either Two Attracting Fixed Points or Only One Attractmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ray tails for exponential maps have been considered by many authors, for example, [2] and [11]. In [5], Kisaka considered ray tails for structurally finite transcendental entire functions.…”
Section: B Has Either Two Attracting Fixed Points or Only One Attractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baker wandering domains may have any connectivity, finite or infinite [KS08] (the eventual connectivity will be 2 or ∞). These may coexist with simply connected wandering domains [Be].…”
Section: Example 211 (A Baker Wandering Domain)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifying the construction for small values of n, they obtain Baker wandering domains with any finite, or with infinite connectivity (as well as with many further properties; see [KS08,Be]). …”
Section: Example 211 (A Baker Wandering Domain)mentioning
confidence: 99%