2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-006-9022-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Myopic Stability Concepts for Hedonic Games

Abstract: We present a unified look at myopic stability concepts for hedonic games, and discuss the status of the existence problems of stable coalition structures. In particular, we show that contractual strictly core stable coalition structures always exist, and present a sufficient condition for the existence of contractually Nash stable coalition structures on the class of separable games. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007coalition formation, hedonic games, separability, taxonomy, C71, A14, D20,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main focus in hedonic games has been on notions of stability for coalition structures such as Nash stability, individual stability, contractual individual stability, or core stability and characterizing conditions under which the set of stable partitions is guaranteed to be non-empty (see, e.g., Bogomolnaia and Jackson, 2002; Burani and Zwicker, 2003). Sung and Dimitrov (2007b) presented a taxonomy of stability concepts which includes the contractual strict core, the most general stability concept that is guaranteed to exist. A wellstudied special case of hedonic games are two-sided matching games in which only coalitions of size two are admissible (Roth and Sotomayor, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main focus in hedonic games has been on notions of stability for coalition structures such as Nash stability, individual stability, contractual individual stability, or core stability and characterizing conditions under which the set of stable partitions is guaranteed to be non-empty (see, e.g., Bogomolnaia and Jackson, 2002; Burani and Zwicker, 2003). Sung and Dimitrov (2007b) presented a taxonomy of stability concepts which includes the contractual strict core, the most general stability concept that is guaranteed to exist. A wellstudied special case of hedonic games are two-sided matching games in which only coalitions of size two are admissible (Roth and Sotomayor, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The aim of this paper is to study coalitional extension of Nash stability under FX-FE membership rights, referred to as strong Nash stability, which has not been studied yet. Note that strong Nash stability is not defined in Sung and Dimitrov (2007) but they identified some weaker versions of strong Nash stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that if a 4 Other stability concepts that consider individual deviations under different membership rights have already been studied in the literature. That is, individual stability is defined under FX-AE membership rights (see Bogomolnaia and Jackson (2002)), contractual Nash stability is defined under AX-FE membership rights (see Sung and Dimitrov (2007)), and contractual individual stability is defined under AX-AE membership rights (see Bogomolnaia and Jackson (2002) and Ballester (2004)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Section 2 we introduce some basic notions from the theory of simple games and hedonic games, and discuss different stability concepts for hedonic games (see also Sung and Dimitrov (2005)). In Section 3 we first define the simple game that corresponds to the distribution of seats in the 16th German Bundestag and then induce a hedonic game by using the Shapley value of all subgames of the simple game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%