1995
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01022-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On non-standard couplings among the electroweak vector bosons

Abstract: Application of a Stueckelberg transformation allows one to connect various Lagrangians which have been independently proposed for non-standard couplings. We discuss the reduction of the number of independent parameters in the Lagrangian and compare symmetry arguments with dimensional arguments.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the second term in Eq. 1consisting of operators up to energy dimension six, is also required to have local SUð2Þ L Â Uð1Þ Y gauge symmetry and the underlying physics is described using a linear realization [18] of the SUð2Þ L Â Uð1Þ Y symmetry. By considering operators that give rise to nonstandard WW and ZWW couplings at the tree level, L eff can be parametrized in terms of the i parameters [19].…”
Section: Relations Between Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the second term in Eq. 1consisting of operators up to energy dimension six, is also required to have local SUð2Þ L Â Uð1Þ Y gauge symmetry and the underlying physics is described using a linear realization [18] of the SUð2Þ L Â Uð1Þ Y symmetry. By considering operators that give rise to nonstandard WW and ZWW couplings at the tree level, L eff can be parametrized in terms of the i parameters [19].…”
Section: Relations Between Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V. Shary, 18 A. A. Shchukin, 40 R. K. Shivpuri, 29 V. Siccardi, 19 V. Simak, 10 V. Sirotenko, 50 P. Skubic, 75 P. Slattery, 71 D. Smirnov, 55 G. R. Snow, 67 J.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also these interactions are already contained in an identical form [42] in the model described in [16,35]. The only difference [50] of the three-parameter model [16,35] and the SU(2) L × U(1) Y invariant one lies in non-standard interactions of the Higgs boson.…”
Section: Parametrization Of Anomalous Couplingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realizing SU(2)×U(1) symmetry non-linearly, or else removing the restriction to dimension-4 terms in the linearized form, removes the restriction κ γ = 1, e.g. [4]. We also note that κ γ = 1 corresponds to a gyromagnetic ratio, g, of the W ± of magnitude g = 2, in units of the particle's Bohr-magneton e/(2M W ), while κ γ = 0 corresponds to g = 1 as obtained for a classical rotating charge distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%