2021
DOI: 10.1137/20m1371798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Optimal Pointwise in Time Error Bounds and Difference Quotients for the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition

Abstract: In this paper, we resolve several long-standing issues dealing with optimal pointwise in time error bounds for proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) reduced order modeling of the heat equation. In particular, we study the role played by difference quotients (DQs) in obtaining reduced order model (ROM) error bounds that are optimal with respect to both the time discretization error and the ROM discretization error. When the DQs are not used, we prove that both the POD projection error and the ROM error are subo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than a decade later, Singler improved Kunisch and Volkwein's results, by proving sharper error bounds [47]. Recently, optimal pointwise in time error bounds were proved in [30]. These results finally bring the G-ROM numerical analysis to a level comparable to (although not as developed as) the level of the numerical analysis of the FEM.…”
Section: Mathematical Foundations Of Rom Closuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…More than a decade later, Singler improved Kunisch and Volkwein's results, by proving sharper error bounds [47]. Recently, optimal pointwise in time error bounds were proved in [30]. These results finally bring the G-ROM numerical analysis to a level comparable to (although not as developed as) the level of the numerical analysis of the FEM.…”
Section: Mathematical Foundations Of Rom Closuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, it turns out that these snapshots are needed for obtaining pointwise estimates in time. In fact, we can repeat the arguments of the previous section to get such estimates for the L 2 (Ω) d error, and also for the H 1 (Ω) d error applying the inverse inequality (19), that cannot be obtained, at least with the same arguments, without adding those snapshots.…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was observed that if the POD basis functions are based on the projection onto the Hilbert space X = L 2 (Ω) d , the difference quotients are not needed to prove optimal error bounds in certain norms, see [4,15,27,23]. However, as pointed out in [19], even in this case, the inclusion of the difference quotients allows to get pointwise estimates in time that generally cannot be proved if there are no difference quotients in the set of snapshots. On the other hand, from the numerical point of view, it is not clear that the difference quotients should be included in the actual simulations with the POD-ROM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, model order reduction (MOR) becomes more popular for solving partial differential equations (PDEs); see [1,6,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Especially, there has been a growing interest in the application of ROMs to modeling incompressible flows [5,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%