On option pricing models in the presence of heavy tails

Abstract

We propose a modification of the option pricing framework derived by Borland which removes the possibilities for arbitrage within this framework. It turns out that such arbitrage possibilities arise due to an incorrect derivation of the martingale transformation in the non-Gaussian option models which are used in that paper. We show how a similar model can be built for the asset price processes which excludes arbitrage. However, the correction causes the pricing formulas to be less explicit than the ones in the original formulation, since the stock price itself is no longer a Markov process. Practical option pricing algorithms will therefore have to resort to Monte Carlo methods or partial differential equations and we show how these can be implemented. An extra parameter, which needs to be specified before the model can be used, will give market makers some extra freedom when fitting their model to market data.Contingent claim pricing, Heavy-tailed distributions, Stochastic volatility,

The Ups and Downs of Modeling Financial Time Series with Wiener Process Mixtures

“…(9), in Vellekoop and Nieuwenhuis [51] it is shown that not all the marginal distribution laws of X t are of Student type.…”

The Physics of Finance: Collective Dynamics in a Complex World

“…However, for q > 1 they incorporate the effects of fatter tails. We also found option pricing formaulae for the generalized model with skew [14], and further work was done by [17]. Since a value of q = 1.4 nicely fits real returns over short to intermediate time horizons, this model is clearly more realistic than the standard Gaussian model.…”

Green functions and Langevin equations for nonlinear diffusion equations: A comment on ‘Markov processes, Hurst exponents, and nonlinear diffusion equations’ by Bassler et al.

“…Refs. [45,[48][49][50]. Therefore, the plausible and realistic autonomous nonlinear Fokker-Planck approach should be given preference over an unrealistic modeling approach by means of non-autonomous linear Fokker-Planck equations.…”