On Organizational Apologia: A Reconceptualization

Abstract

There is much less agreement about the characteristics defining organizational apologia/crisis response than in the case of clearly defined categories such as the eulogy. This lack of agreement can be traced to two conflicting purposes served by the category (image repair and image maintenance) and also the fact that the organizational apologist faces much greater situational variation than in other well-defined categories. This article confronts these difficulties by proposing a reconceptualization of organizational apologia. Drawing on argument field theory, we argue that all organizational apologia must use one or more of four strategies to protect the image of the organization. Regarding image repair, the article proposes a research agenda for identifying the situational characteristics that characterize well-defined subgenres.Over the past 15 years, researchers have focused enormous attention on how organizations respond to crises involving allegations of wrongdoing. Using a variety of approaches, including apologia theory (Ware & Linkugel, 1973), kategoria-based apologia theory (see Dionisopoulos &

The role of a favorable pre-crisis reputation in protecting organizations during crises

“…However, case studies are not the best method to test the causality between independent (here: pre-crisis reputation) and dependent variables (here: reputation loss) (Coombs, 2007). In order to answer the need for more experimental research on crisis communication (Rowland & Jerome, 2004) and in order to more robustly develop theory, this paper uses experimental research as the research method, to examine the causal relations between pre-crisis reputation and reputation loss after a crisis hits. A 2 (pre-crisis reputation: unfavorable versus favorable) × 2 (negative publicity: present versus absent) betweensubjects factorial experimental design tested the hypotheses.…”

The Discourse of Crisis in Public Meetings: Case Study of a School District's Multimillion Dollar Error

“…Although by no means the only theories to understand crisis* Seeger et al (2003) favor enactment theory, chaos theory, and organizational learning theories*the apologia tradition offers an especially rich frame, especially when the interest is in a crisis's texts (i.e., speeches and written statements; e.g., Benoit, 1995;Millar & Heath, 2004;Rowland & Jerome, 2004). An apologia is a speech accounting for untoward action.…”

Framing Kwame Kilpatrick: Third-Party Response to the Text Message Scandal

“…In fact, as Hearit (2006) asserts, ''The necessity to extricate oneself from an unfavorable circumstance is one of the oldest compulsions of the human condition'' (p. 2). Since the 1980s, researchers have focused much attention on how organizational leaders respond to accusations of wrongdoing ( Jerome, 2004). Subsequent work is characterized by a growing number of public individuals who, because of their own actions, have had to speak in defense of themselves (Brazeal, 2008;Legg, 2009;Oles-Acevedo, 2012).…”