2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On overset interpolation strategies and conservation on unstructured grids in OpenFOAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The significantly higher computational cost (Jung and Kwon, 2009) (2) The introduction of numerical errors in the volume of fluid environment, such as violation of mass conservation (Chandar, 2019;Ferziger and Peric, 2001) (3) The limited availability of the overset grid method in commonly used CFD software.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(1) The significantly higher computational cost (Jung and Kwon, 2009) (2) The introduction of numerical errors in the volume of fluid environment, such as violation of mass conservation (Chandar, 2019;Ferziger and Peric, 2001) (3) The limited availability of the overset grid method in commonly used CFD software.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The updated overset grid method in v1812 is assessed by Windt et al (2019a), finding a significant improvement compared to the initial v1706 implement-ation assessed (Windt et al, 2018a) and, thus, showing potential for the application of WEC experiments, specifically for control studies. In (Windt et al, 2019a), the overset implementation in v1812 is also compared to the in-house overset toolbox, opera (Chandar, 2019). While the two overset implementations are found to display good agreement in terms of WEC motion, opera shows considerably better computational efficiency.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations