1994
DOI: 10.2307/1403548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Parameter Estimation for Pairwise Interaction Point Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the model exhibits interactions between pairs of points only. Pairwise interaction models appear to be a useful and flexible class of models for regular patterns, but probably not so for clustered patterns (Diggle et al 1994;Gates and Westcott 1986;and M01ler 1999).…”
Section: Haggstrom Mnm Van Lieshout and J Mollermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the model exhibits interactions between pairs of points only. Pairwise interaction models appear to be a useful and flexible class of models for regular patterns, but probably not so for clustered patterns (Diggle et al 1994;Gates and Westcott 1986;and M01ler 1999).…”
Section: Haggstrom Mnm Van Lieshout and J Mollermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of γ between 0 and 1 discourage but do not forbid events to be within distance ρ of each other. Note that the normalizing constant, C, of the Strauss process can be difficult to calculate, especially for processes demonstrating strong inhibition (see Diggle et al 1994). …”
Section: Minefield Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, with the solid line on the left being the estimate of and the solid line on the right being the estimate of V. CONCLUSION Although the sufficient statistic for performing the likelihood ratio test for pairwise interaction point processes is easy to compute, the evaluation of its performance is a challenging problem. The limit theorem of Appendix A shows that in the case of sparseness, the distribution of could be approximated by the distribution of the shot-noise random variable , and it is then shown that the distribution of could be computed using (6) or (12), depending on the form of the interaction function. While the analysis of (6) in Section IV-A is straightforward, the derivation of (12) in Section IV-B is more complicated, and the details are found in Appendix B. Extensions are treated in Appendix C. Finally, we note that our analysis of the sparseness conditions in Appendix D in the case of square regions leads to a simply computable value for the constant which appears in the characteristic function of in (5 (3) and (4)) and Now, the hypotheses of our theorem are sufficient for us to apply [3 …”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%