2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On possible proxies of AGN light-curves cadence selection in future time domain surveys

Abstract: Motivated by upcoming photometric and spectroscopic surveys (Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), Manuakea Spectroscopic Explorer), we design the statistical proxies to measure the cadence effects on active galactic nuclei (AGN) variability-observables (time-lags, periodicity, and structure-function (SF)). We constructed a multiple-regression model to statistically identify the cadence-formal error pattern knowing AGN time-lags and periodicity from different surveys. We defined the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To simulate this effect, the so‐called red noise is superposed to the generated signal. The red noise is modeled using the approach discussed in Kovačević et al (2021) or the paper describing the PoSKI model. We added the red noise as 30% of the light curve maximum, although different values can be adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate this effect, the so‐called red noise is superposed to the generated signal. The red noise is modeled using the approach discussed in Kovačević et al (2021) or the paper describing the PoSKI model. We added the red noise as 30% of the light curve maximum, although different values can be adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test our implementation of the photoRM method, we perform several experiments with a set of 19 artificially generated pairs of light curves of the continuum and line emission with different time‐lags ranging from a few days to several months. The light curves were generated as described in Kovačević et al (2021b), and are further entangled using the prescription in Chelouche & Daniel (2012). The procedure involves the entanglement of the generated continuum and emission‐line light curves (eq.…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuum light curves were generated using the damped random walk (DRW) model (Kelly et al 2009), with the characteristic amplitude σ and timescale τtrue˜ inferred from the SMBH mass and/or AGN luminosity. The DRW model parameters, σ and τtrue˜, are calculated from the first principles: assuming a priori theoretical distributions of AGN luminosity, SMBH mass, and BLR radius as given in Kovačević et al (2021b). The simulated light curves have idealized cadence of 1 day over the interval of 5,000 days (13.7 years).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several approaches for modeling AGN light curves, such as damped random walk (DRW, Kelly et al 2009; Kozlowski 2017; Sánchez‐Sáez et al 2018), Gaussian Process (GP) with different kernels (Kovačević et al 2019; Shapovalova et al 2017; Shapovalova et al 2019) or Autoencoders (Tachibana et al 2020). Initial application of GPs (Kovačević et al 2021) shows that machine learning can be useful for time lag and periodicity detection for light curves with cadences above 100 observations per 10 years. The optical variability of AGNs has been most commonly represented by a stochastic model based on DRW process (Kelly et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%